The answer to this question is Upper-left
The creator of a website will generally want that the visitors wanted to know who are responsible in making the content.
Because of this, they usually put their name on the upper left because most people will start reading a page from that spot
Answer: $12
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Art purchased 2,500 shares of Delta stock and his purchase represents 10 percent ownership in the firm. We are further told that his shares have increased in value from the $12 a share he originally paid to today's market value of $13 a share.
Assume Delta goes bankrupt and owes $450,000 more in debts than the firm can pay after liquidating all of its assets, the maximum loss per share Art will incur on this investment will be the purchase price per share which was given in the question as $12.
This is because when a firm guess bankrupt, the maximum loss which will be incurred by Art will be the value of his investment which is $12.
Answer:
In employment law, a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) (US) or bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR) (Canada) or genuine occupational qualification (GOQ) (UK) is a quality or an attribute that employers are allowed to consider when making decisions on the hiring and retention of employees—a quality that when considered in other contexts would constitute discrimination and thus be in violation of civil rights employment law. Such qualifications must be listed in the employment offering.[citation needed]
Explanation:
Canada
The law of Canada regarding bona fide occupational requirements was considered in a 1985 Canadian court case involving an employee of the Canadian National Railway, K. S. Bhinder, a Sikh whose religion required that he wear a turban, lost his challenge of the CNR policy that required him to wear a hard hat.[1] In 1990, in deciding another case, the Supreme Court of Canada amended the Bhinder decision: "An employer that has not adopted a policy with respect to accommodation and cannot otherwise satisfy the trier of fact that individual accommodation would result in undue hardship will be required to justify his conduct with respect to the individual complainant. Even then the employer can invoke the BFOQ defence."[2]
United States
In employment discrimination law in the United States, both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act contain a BFOQ defense. The BFOQ provision of Title VII provides that:
[I]t shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to hire and employ employees, for an employment agency to classify, or refer for employment any individual, for a labor organization to classify its membership or to classify or refer for employment any individual, or for an employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining programs to admit or employ any individual in any such program, on the basis of his religion, sex, or national origin in those certain instances where religion, sex, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise ...[3]
i'm not able to add the balance of the answer so pls go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bona_fide_occupational_qualification
Idk so you need to ask somebody else because I’m really dumb and I don’t have the answer for u
Answer:
<u>the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration)</u>
Explanation:
The Food and Drug Administration is a federal agency, which is allowed under US law to prevent an operation from going on if it determines that an imminent health hazard still exists.
However, according to the FDA food code, <em>"if immediate corrective action is taken, there is no "Imminent Health Hazard," meaning</em> the operation can get approval from the agency to reopen.
