Olivia, a citizen of nebraska, wants to file a suit against micah, a citizen of kansas. their diversity of citizenship may be a basis for a<u> "federal" </u>court to exercise jurisdiction.
Federal courts are set up under the U.S. Constitution to choose debate including the Constitution and laws gone by Congress.
Federal court jurisdiction, by differentiate, is restricted to the sorts of cases recorded in the Constitution and particularly accommodated by Congress. Generally, federal courts just hear:
Cases in which the United States is a gathering;
Cases including infringement of the U.S. Constitution or government laws (under administrative inquiry purview);
Cases between natives of various states if the sum in debate surpasses $75,000 (under decent variety purview); and Bankruptcy, copyright, patent, and sea law cases.
I believe that this question has the following options: <span> A)Nationalism B)monoculturalism C)industrial capitalism D)liberalism .
Among those, the best answer is liberarism, but I think that a correct answer is actually libertarianism: this one truly represents the freedom of choice that people want to have, away from government influence. </span>
<span />
<span>has been encoded during unusually high levels of stress</span>
<span>Burning the flag is a way of protesting
usually most forms of protest related to freedom of speech
. So if they were to ban it means that they would take away part of our freedom of speech. and we canonot even speak or protest against them
hope it helps</span>
Answer:
1798 and were authored by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison,
Explanation:
The Virginia Resolution, authored by Madison, said that by enacting the Alien and Sedition Acts, Congress was exercising “a power not delegated by the Constitution, but on the contrary, expressly and positively forbidden by one of the amendments thereto; a power, which more than any other, ought to produce universal alarm, because it is leveled against that right of freely examining public characters
