Answer:
The resulting CA percentage for the week to the nearest number is 94%
Explanation:
CA refers to Commitment Adherence.
Commitment Adherence (CA) is a way to calculate the reliability of an employee in relation to how much time they put into their work.
Put differently, it is a mathematical comparison between how much time you stated that you were going to work versus the actual amount worked. This concept is prevalent with people who use clock-in and clock-out system to measure productivity.
Step 1
The formula for calculating Commitment Adherence (CA) is:
(Serviced Minutes - Excused Non-Serviced Minutes) / (Posted Minutes + Released Minutes)
When you log out at about 5 minutes early it translates to 83% because each interval is 30 minutes. So 23/30 = 83%
Step 2
There are 8 intervals. 5 of them are 100% each. Thus total intervals for the week equal
(5*100%)+(3*83%) =
7.49 *30 = 224.7
Total number of intervals selected =
8*30 = 240
Therefore commitment adherence = 224.7/240
= 0.94%
Cheers!
Answer: low invol- Georgina Megan Dina
High invol Laura Charles jonny
Explanation:
Well managers learn more efficient ways than most others which helps them alot such as having people on task, making sure no one is lacking on working times or any thing is messed up. managers are the ones who keep tracks on tasks that not alot of others can.
Answer:
U.S. Tax Burden on Cola:
The amount of the tax on a case of cola is $4 per case. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $1 per case, and the burden that falls on producers is ___$3______ per case.
The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers.
a. True
b. False
Explanation:
The tax burden on consumers, which is represented by the difference in the price of cola from $5 to $6 per unit is $1 ($6 - $5). However, the cash received by producers reduced by $3 from $5 to $2. This shows that the total tax burden on both consumers and producers is $4 ($1 + $3).
This represents a total tax burden of $4 or about 67% based on the new selling price of cola or 80% based on the old selling price of cola.
"The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers alone. This because the price of cola would have increased to $9 per unit. Since the demand for cola in this instance is elastic, this change in price would have caused a more than 80% change in the quantity demanded.
