Answer:
The rocks at the bottom of the ocean are younger than the rocks on the continent. This can be pessible due to the process called Continental Drift.
Explanation:
For a long time the human being wondered what would be the age relationship between the rocks at the bottom of the ocean and the rocks of the continent. Which rocks were younger or older? The scientific advance that humanity achieved during the second world war allowed this question to be answered, as it was during this period that "sonar" was created, a device that is able to reveal the ocean floor
From the creation of this device, and other equipment, scientists were able to study the underwater mountains known as oceanic dorsals. During these studies, scientists were able to create methods of donating rocks and were able to conclude that the closer to the oceanic mountains the rocks were, the younger they were. On the other hand, the closer to the continent, the rocks were, the older they were. They will conclude that this must have been influenced by the phenomenon called continental drift, which refers to the movement of the masses of the planet over a period of time.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Neither rock A nor B could become metamorphic rocks.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Magma is the molten rock under the surface hardens into igneous rock. This rock breaks down over time under the process of weathering.
- These pieces of "igneous rocks" are cemented together with other bits of rocks to form sedimentary rocks.
- These rocks get buried under the geological processes like earthquakes. Now, coming in contact with high temperatures and magma, these rocks get changed into metamorphic rocks.
- So, from option A, igneous rock is formed. When combined with rock B and other rocks, sedimentary rocks are formed.
- Metamorphic rocks are formed in the next process. Therefore, neither of the two rocks could become "metamorphic rocks".
The Von Thunen model has an epicenter which is the center of a settlement. The model shown has a center area and grows outward just like the Von Thunen model. All the important goods are closer together while the forest and non important goods are farther outward. The new map makes the assumptions of goods are carried out by railroads and the climate and soil quality are the same throughout the map but may vary depending on specific areas very much like the Von Thunen Model.
Hope this helps. I'm on this question too so I could be wrong but at least I tried.
Number one is to use case to find out what happened to something
