Answer:The French Revolution French Revolution was a horrifying event that was from 1789 to 1799. The revolution overthrew the monarchy, established a republic and created political chaos. The french revolution started because most people were denied basic rights because the King and Queen cared only for themselves, the economic crisis in France, and social injustices. The King had unlimited power and he declared himself as the representative of God. “...Powers of the king — The King, Louis XVI, was absolute. He ruled by the divine right theory which held that he had received his power to govern from God and was therefore responsible to God alone” (Doc C) Louis XIV once stated “I am the State”, he is the sole ruler of France and he believes that his people should have no say in the government or any power. In 1798 Jacques Necker, french statesman and finance minister for King Louis XVI, insisted that the king call together the estates general. The estates general was made up of many hand picked deputies, whom the King thought would vote in his favour of reforms. There were three Estates, the First Estate, the clergy, the Second Estate, the nobility and the Third Estate, the bourgeoisie and the peasants. There was great conflict between the various estates that held the voting powers and they disputed how the voting would be implemented. Each estate had one representative and one vote. The third estate was usually out voted by the first and second. This caused the third estate
Explanation:
Answer:Remove the requirement to perform in front of the class since students seems to enjoy and perform well in pairs
Explanation:
According to Skinner in operant conditioning , negative reinforcement is a reinforcement in which we remove or stop an aversive stimulus in order to enforce or strengthen a behavior or response. Aversive stimuli is that stimuli which has a tendency of making us physcally or psychologically uncomfortable.
When an aversive stimuli is removed then our behavior has been negatively reinforced. An action is taken in advance in order to prevent a negative outcome.
Answer:
Explanation:
The main similarity between political parties and interest groups is that they both seek to achieve certain policy objectives. These can be a broad range of policy objectives or only a relative few.
Political parties have a large number of policy objectives that they wish to achieve, whereas pressure groups tend to have only a few. Some pressure groups, such as those that campaign for the protection of the environment, are based around a single issue.
As such, pressure groups tend to have greater coherence than political parties, as it is much easier for their members to unite around a common single objective than a broad range of policies.
This helps to explain why pressure groups endeavor to bring about changes in policy without attaining political power. Their focus is so narrow that it would be virtually impossible for them to secure the kind of broad-based coalition that is essential in a democracy for a political party.
However, despite remaining outside of the formal democratic process, pressure groups—as their name implies—can still exert considerable pressure on policy-makers in order to get the changes that they seek.
Such changes are not always forthcoming, however, because political parties tend to be quite broad-based coalitions. This means that policy-makers need to take into consideration a broad range of stakeholders whose interests are often opposed to those of relevant pressure groups. As a consequence, any changes made by political parties in power tend not to be as bold or as radical as pressure groups, who don't have to deal with the necessary compromises of political power in a democracy, would like.
B. Fire risk increased due to the closeness of buildings.
The answer is D, Modern agriculture to grow crops.
