Answer:
the right to attend classes at a school
Explanation:
This question seeks to address why we go to school. We go to school to study and get certificates of qualification. To study, we have to pay tuition fees. Tuition fees constituent fifty percent of a school’s income, and without it, you will not be able to get into a classroom in the first place. It covers almost 70% of what the student does in school and this to study in a class. It pays for all academics and research, the library, teaching support, and many more. A place to live at a school and transportation expenses are probably not included in tuition fees. These are other expenses that a student requires to survive.
The Correct answer would be C. <span>microphone,mouse,scanner
microphone you talk into to give info (data)
a mouse you use to click on objects to give input
a scanner you input a paper/object
hope this helps!! :)
</span>
Answer:
The fundamental limitation of symmetric (secret key) encryption is ... how do two parties (we may as well assume they are Alice and Bob) agree on a key? In order for Alice and Bob to communicate securely they need to agree on a secret key. In order to agree on a secret key, they need to be able to communicate securely. In terms of the pillars of IA, To provide CONFIDENTIALITY, a secret key must first be shared. But to initially share the key, you must already have CONFIDENTIALITY. It's a whole chicken-and-egg problem.
This problem is especially common in the digital age. We constantly end up at websites with whom we decide we want to communicate securely (like online stores) but with whom we there is not really an option to communicate "offline" to agree on some kind of secret key. In fact, it's usually all done automatically browser-to-server, and for the browser and server there's not even a concept of "offline" — they only exist online. We need to be able to establish secure communications over an insecure channel. Symmetric (secret key) encryption can't do this for us.
Asymmetric (Public-key) Encryption
Yet one more reason I'm barred from speaking at crypto conferences.
xkcd.com/177/In asymmetric (public key) cryptography, both communicating parties (i.e. both Alice and Bob) have two keys of their own — just to be clear, that's four keys total. Each party has their own public key, which they share with the world, and their own private key which they ... well, which they keep private, of course but, more than that, which they keep as a closely guarded secret. The magic of public key cryptography is that a message encrypted with the public key can only be decrypted with the private key. Alice will encrypt her message with Bob's public key, and even though Eve knows she used Bob's public key, and even though Eve knows Bob's public key herself, she is unable to decrypt the message. Only Bob, using his secret key, can decrypt the message ... assuming he's kept it secret, of course.
Explanation:
When resizing an image or an object in a presentation, a user should not utilize the sizing handles in the middle of the sides or the bottom of the image. There's nothing wrong with resizing this way.
There's nothing wrong with resizing this way
<u>Explanation:</u>
When the sizing handles in the middle of the sides are used, the image stretches out reflecting an increase in the width maintaining There's nothing wrong with resizing this way.
On the other hand, while using the sizing handles at the bottom, the image increases in height whilst maintaining the same width again disturbing the aspect ratio.
Answer:
standalone computer
Explanation:
If your PC is not connected to a network, it is referred to as a standalone computer.
Hope this helped and have a good day
