All categories

3 years ago

Plz Help Urgent

2 answers:

7 0

Its A.It suggests that Jessica may have been careless because she was trying to work fast.
I did a test and got this answer right! Hope I helped...

Nookie1986 [14]3 years ago

4 0

The correct answer is A.

You might be interested in

Examine the image in the section "7. Cells have various ways of reproducing," and read the selection below.

Ymorist [56]

Answer:

d,what happens to dna during mitosis

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In Act III, Scene iii, Hamlet has an opportunity to kill Claudius, but he does not act. One scene later, however, Hamlet does no

spin [16.1K]

In Act III, Scene 3, Hamlet has an opportunity to kill Claudius, but he doesn't act because he doesn't want to risk sending Claudius to heaven by killing him in prayer. Hamlet doesn't want to break the decorum. He wants to surprise a villain in some vile deed and kill him at that. "He took my father grossly, full of bread,
With all his crimes broad blown, as flush as May." If Claudius didn't care about his brother's immortal soul, Hamlet should now pay extra attention to Claudius' soul and do his best to send it to hell. The very thought of the risk stops his sword.

Hamlet's inaction in Scene 3 is not just a result of plain superstition. Hamlet doesn't just want to kill and annihilate Claudius; he symbolically and unequivocally condemns his uncle's soul to hell. However, one scene later, he kills Polonius, mistaking him for Claudius. All his restraints are now off, and he is free to kill the person hiding behind the curtain.

This plot choice clearly shows that Hamlet always acts like an intellectual, even when he is hurt and offended. He has to rationalize both his inaction and his action. More precisely, thinking always precedes (and motivates) his actions and inactions. Irony has it that his action is misdirected, once it happens.

By the way, the R.A.C.E. analytical method contains Restatement, Answer, Citation, and Explanation. I think I've covered all the elements here.

3 0

3 years ago

Recommend TWO ways in which a person should approach conflict resolution in order to sustain health relationships.

solmaris [256]

Answer:

Step 1

I seek to understand the other side before wanting to be understood.

Conflict resolution often goes in the wrong direction when people only focus on making the other side understand them.

If both sides only seek to be understood, there can’t be any constructive dialogue.

I try to tell the story of the conflict from the other side’s: What is their intention? What are their need/want? Where are they coming from?

**their = his or her.

Step 2

I identify the *real* Issues

Once I understand the other side, I can better assess what this conflict means to me:

I visualize the current state and the ideal situation. The gap between those two is the real issue. If there is no (foreseeable) gap for me, then there is no conflict for me.

But if there is a gap, I look for a pattern and the layers in the conflict. I ask why? at least 5 times to get to the core of the conflict.

Step 3

Seek the Win-Win situation

If I know what’s at the core of the issue and believe to have a good understanding of the other side, it’s now time to negotiate and find common ground.

My general approach to find the win-win situation is to kill the other side with kindness.

I first acknowledge their feelings and ask them if what I think they want is what they want. If I assessed the other side incorrectly, I listen and re-evaluate my understanding of their situation. If necessary, I apologize but never expected an apology in return.

In this negotiation I also make sure that I get what I want. The key to sustainable healthy relationships is to approach conflict resolution knowing and not loosing sight of exactly what you want. Please forget about ever resolving any issues with anyone if you don’t know what you want to get out of the interaction with other people.

At the end of the negotiation, I summarized what happened and reiterated what needs to happen in the future to avoid further conflict. If needed, I allow myself to be corrected. It’s very important for both sides to walk away feeling good about the conversation.

Step 4

Check and Adjust

Some conflicts might appeared solved, but as variables change, there might be new negotiations needed to re-adjust the win-win situation.

Also one must contemplate that not every conflict is meant to be solved because not every conflict has a real impact or because its resolution is not important to one of the sides.

It takes two to not only to tango but to create and resolve conflict.

8 0

3 years ago

Read the following sentence from Paragraph 3 of Federalist No. 10 and answer the question.

Pavel [41]

Answer: C) They may view the extent of the issues and help to clarify the nation's true interests.

Explanation: In the given sentence we can see the explanation of how the choosing of a body of citizens, helps to refine and enlarge the public views, it says that this chosen body of citizens can discern the real interest of the country and put it before their own intereses because of the love they have for their country (their patriotism), and the justice, so the answer that best resumes this idea is option C.

3 0

3 years ago

Please help A.S.A.P!

Effectus [21]

"I can't come with you as I am too busy."

8 0

3 years ago