All categories

3 years ago

If 2 inches equal 25 miles. then how many inches would it take to get 60 miles?

Mathematics

2 answers:

melisa1 [442]3 years ago

6 0

4.8 inches is the answer

Tresset [83]3 years ago

4 0

The answer is 4.8 inches

You might be interested in

Does anyone know the answer to this scale and unit conversion GED math problem? Thank you very much!

aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

Flour $5\dfrac{1}{2}\ c$

Sugar $2\dfrac{2}{3}\ c$

Butter $1\dfrac{1}{2}\ c$

Eggs $2$

Baking powder $7\ t$

Vanilla extract $3\ t$

Step-by-step explanation:

There will be 16 people at the party. Each person will eat 3 cookies, so all people will eat $16\cdot 3=48$ cookies.

Given cookie recipe makes 24 cookies, so to make 48 cookies you need

$48:24=2$ portions.

Thus,

1 portion 2 portions

Flour $2 \dfrac{3}{4}\ c$ $2\dfrac{3}{4}\cdot 2=2\cdot 2+\dfrac{3}{4}\cdot 2=4+\dfrac{3}{2}=4+1 \dfrac{1}{2}=5\dfrac{1}{2}\ c$

Sugar $1\dfrac{1}{3}\ c$ $1\dfrac{1}{3}\cdot 2=1\cdot 2+\dfrac{1}{3}\cdot 2=2+\dfrac{2}{3}=2\dfrac{2}{3}\ c$

Butter $\dfrac{3}{4}\ c$ $\dfrac{3}{4}\cdot 2=\dfrac{3}{2}=1\dfrac{1}{2}\ c$

Eggs $1$ $1\cdot 2=2$

Powder $3\dfrac{1}{2}\ t$ $3\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot 2=3\cdot 2+\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot 2=6+1=7\ t$

Vanilla $1\dfrac{1}{2}\ t$ $1\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot 2=1\cdot 2+\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot 2=2+1=3\ t$

8 0

3 years ago

12 divided by the sum of h and 2

irinina [24]

Putting this into expression form, it would be:
12 ÷ (h + 2)
Hope this helps!

6 0

3 years ago

Shirts are 5% off. The original price of one shirt is $15. What is the total cost, in dollars, of a shirt at the sale price, inc

Juliette [100K]

Answer:

$15.75

Step-by-step explanation:

$\frac{y}{15} :\frac{5}{100}$

y × 100 = 5 × 15

100y = 75

100y ÷ 100 = 75 ÷ 100

y = 0.75

$15 - $0.75

$14.25

$\frac{y}{15} :\frac{10}{100}$

y × 100 = 10 × 15

100y = 150

100y ÷ 100 = 150 ÷ 100

y = 1.5

$14.25 + $1.50

$15.75

8 0

2 years ago

Use the data in LAWSCH85 for this exercise. (i) Using the same model as in Problem 4 in Chapter 3, state and test the null hypot

natka813 [3]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

In the model

Log (salary) = B0 + B1LSAT +B2GPA +B3log(libvol) +B4log(cost)+B5 rank+u

The hypothesis that rank has no effect on log (salary) is H0:B5 = 0. The estimated equation (now with standard errors) is

Log (salary) = 8.34 + .0047 LSAT + .248 GPA + .095 log(libvol)

(0.53) (.0040) (.090) (.033)

+ .038 log(cost) – .0033 rank

(.032) (.0003)

n = 136, R2 = .842.

The t statistic on rank is –11(i.e. 0.0033/0.0003), which is very significant. If rank decreases by 10 (which is a move up for a law school), median starting salary is predicted to increase by about 3.3%.

(ii) LSAT is not statistically significant (t statistic ≈1.18) but GPA is very significance (t statistic ≈2.76). The test for joint significance is moot given that GPA is so significant, but for completeness the F statistic is about 9.95 (with 2 and 130 df) and p-value ≈.0001.

6 0

3 years ago

Heather writes the equations below to represent two lines drawn on the coordinate plane.

pentagon [3]

According to the represented datum, the correct answer is : equation has no solution; therefore, the system of equations has no solution because it is imposible <span> when girl should rich 0 = 60.
I am pretty sure it helps! Do hope you will agree with me.</span>

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers