Us government lesson 4

History

1 answer:

Pachacha [2.7K]3 years ago

5 0

7. The Anti-Federalists. In the ratification debate, the Anti-Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. ... One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states. 8. One of the major compromises in the Constitutional Convention was between the small states and big states. The small states wanted each state to have the same number of representatives in Congress. The big states wanted representation based on population.

9. Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

You might be interested in

Identify the criteria that determine whether a case is within the jurisdiction of a federal court, and compare the types of fede

kap26 [50]

<span>Federal Court Jurisdiction
The authority of a federal court to hear a case, its so-called "jurisdiction," is limited by the constitution to certain subject matters and parties.

Subject Matter
Federal Court Jurisdiction is often involves cases involving "federal questions," - the interpretation of a provision in the Constitution and application of any federal law or treaty, or a question of admiralty or maritime law, or cases between certain parties.

Parties
A case also falls within Federal Court Jurisdiction if the case involves
(1) the United States or one of its officers or agencies
(2) an ambassador, consul, or other official representative of a foreign government
(3) one of the 50 states suing another state, a resident of another state, or a foreign government or one of its subjects
(4) a citizen of one State suing a citizen of another State
(5) an American citizen suing a foreign government or one of its subjects
(6) a citizen of a State suing another citizen of the same State where both claim title to land under grants from different States</span>

8 0

2 years ago

Someone please help me with this please please pleasee!!!

ZanzabumX [31]

I’m pretty sure the 2nd one

7 0

2 years ago

At the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries, European leaders started to introduce social reforms.

fgiga [73]

"Guaranteed employment for all working-age people" is the one among the following choices given in the question that was not a reform. he correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "b". I hope that this is the answer that has come to your help.

6 0

3 years ago

How did cities solve the problems of crime and fire?

Trava [24]

Answer:

fire fighters and police

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

2 points

iragen [17]

Answer: Most historians agree that American involvement in World War I was inevitable by early 1917, but the march to war was no doubt accelerated by a notorious letter penned by German foreign secretary Arthur Zimmermann. On January 16, 1917, British code breakers intercepted an encrypted message from Zimmermann intended for Heinrich von Eckardt, the German ambassador to Mexico. The missive gave the ambassador a now-famous set of instructions: if the neutral United States entered the war on the side of the Allies, Von Eckardt was to approach Mexico’s president with an offer to forge a secret wartime alliance. The Germans would provide military and financial support for a Mexican attack on the United States, and in exchange Mexico would be free to annex “lost territory in Texas, New Mexico and Arizona.” In addition, Von Eckardt was told to use the Mexicans as a go-between to entice the Japanese Empire to join the German cause.

Explanation:

It might be right i dont know

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers