1. Timespan
2. Plots (events that make up the story and what leads up to the resolution)
3. Conflict complexity
Why? Well, see below!
Short stories and novels are very different, and they vary in many different categories that make up why they’re called what they’re called. One difference between these two is the timespans set. In short stories, the timespan tends to be very short because as mentioned, it is a short story. The plot is kept simple, and a short solution to a problem is identified and put into action. The next difference is plot (and subplots). Plots are a huge difference between these two because in a short story, little capacity of description is provided, whereas in a novel, the plot is described more in depth. It typically is more reasonable to read a novel because the plot familiarizes itself with the reader, which results in a better comprehension of how the problem is brought about and solved. The final difference is conflict complexity. This is a big difference as well between novels and short stories because in a novel, the conflict is less timely and more descriptive. The protagonist may often encounter more conundrums in the path of solving one, which would make the general conflict more difficult to solve. If you need extra help, let me know and I will gladly assist you.
Answer: A famine
Explanation:
The Middle Kingdom of ancient Egypt was a period between 2030 to 1650 B.C when Egypt regained stability after the chaos of the First Intermediate period. It saw great pharaohs such as Senusret III and Amenemhat III.
Towards the end of the reign of Pharaoh Amenemhat III, the river Nile saw its flood levels drop which the Egyptians were very reliant on. This created a famine where crop yields were dangerously low leading to the decline of the Middle Kingdom.
All through the 17 century, the Colonies had no legitimate government or control. The states were private endeavors with sanctions from the British government; however, nothing came in the method for the supervision of help in light of political strife in Great Britain.
After the chaos over the government was settled, Britain had been changed into a Constitutional Monarchy in which the crown and Parliament together dominated. England currently ended up more grounded and increasingly incorporated.
White Southerners wanted the land, so the U.S. government granted it to them.
Only the private sector can create both positive and negative externalities.
