Answer:
Ex post facto
Explanation:
Ex post facto may be considered a form of research pattern whereby the facts are already established beforehand. That is findings about a particular phenomenon or occurence begins only after the facts about the incident or phenomenon has been established. It is also called after the fact research whereby the researcher only delves into finding patterned after the facts have been established without the knowledge, understanding of the researcher. Ex post facto is used to understand the pattern or effect rather than if the fact or problems truly exists.
"Change form"
-The transition of one rock into another by temperatures and/or pressures unlike those in which it formed.
Explanation:
Supreme Court decision. On June 13, 1966, the Supreme Court issued a 5–4 decision in Miranda's favor that overturned his conviction and remanded his case back to Arizona for retrial.
The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, ruled that the prosecution could not introduce Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal trial because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Hope you get something out of this 乁[ ◕ ᴥ ◕ ]ㄏ
