The correct answer is definitely: corruption.
Indeed, the analogy speaks of something rotten and usually what rots are perishable goods as fruit, vegetables and meat. The analogy is using the physical metaphor of putrefaction to show that a state can also putrefy, i.e. be corrupted. A fruit is a physical item; a state is a notion that represents men of power organized and in command of others, using the physical and intellectual resources of the state to run the country.
Shakespeare is using this metaphor to show that moral corruption in turn causes physical corruption. Another notion associated with this analogy is the notion of the body politic versus the body individual. The body individual is the body of a person; the body politic is the state (including the King). King Claudius has murdered King Hamlet and King Hamlets body is rotting in its tomb. Because he was the King of the state, i.e. the body politic, the state is dying and it has been Claudius that has infected it with his corruption.
Marcello’s words foreshadow Prince Hamlet’s discovery of Claudius’ crime.
Answer:
the evidence supporting a claim about the benefits of water conservation.
Explanation:
Please Mark Braniest
I can help you with your english
I believe that its D, because this is talking about the effects of the nation...
(but idk I'm just a middle school pleb)
Answer:
im not sure if that was both the stories or not so i dont know where to start and stop it looks like one but i can still help.
inference 1: i can make an inference that his brother must be troubled because zafrain says that dane "frightens him to death".
inference 2: i think that zafrain was running from someone or something and might need help because his brother took him to a safe house.
Explanation:
