Answer:
B. Step 2 uses the associative property, and step 3 uses the commutative property.
Step-by-step explanation:
The associative property lets you group terms for addition any way you like. It appears that in Step 2, the grouping is ...
4 + (1/6 + 3) + 5/6
The commutative property lets you change the order of any pair of terms involved in addition. It appears that in Step 3, the order of the terms within the group has been swapped.
4 + (3 + 1/6) + 5/6
_____
<em>Comment on associative and commutative properties</em>
What applies to terms in addition applies to factors in multiplication.
3b=y+3x
To solve for B you need to put B before the equals sign
You have to say what or where point B and C is for me to answer it
Both expression have the same denominator: 9x²-1. Thus it must not be 0.
9x²-1=(3x-1)(3x+1)=0, resulting x=+-1/3.
Restrictions: x in R\{-1/3, 1/3}
Adding those expressions:
E=(-x-2)/(9x²-1 ) + (-5x+4)/(9x²-1)=
(-x-2-5x+4)/(9x²-1)=(-6x+2)/(9x²-1)=
(-2)(3x-1)/(9x²-1)=-2/(3x+1)
E=-2/(3x+1)
Answer:
Type I error.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's remember the definition of Type I error and Type II error:
A type I error is the rejection of a true null hypothesis, this means that we would get a "false positive" with this error.
A type II error is the non rejection of a not true null hypothesis, this error would give us a "false negative".
In this problem, we are told that the mean match score to identify a suspect is 80. However, the test shows that the mean match score is more than 80 when the person doesn't have a fingerprint match (and therefore the person would not be a suspect). Therefore, this person would appear as a suspect when he/she really isn't one. This means that the test is giving a "false positive". Thus, this is a type I error.
