According to social judgment theory, <u>the judgmental anchor</u> is the person's actual or preferred position.
A framework for studying human judgement is called social judgement theory. It is a meta-theory that guides study on cognitive perspective, or how one interprets the world. A contrast effect is likely to occur when a stimulus is further from one's judging anchor, while an assimilation effect may occur when the stimulus is close to the anchor, according to the underlying psychophysical principle.
The social judgement theory represents an effort to apply the findings and psychophysical principles of judgement to social judgement. SJT is a theory that primarily concentrates on a person's internal processes of their own judgement in relation to the relation inside a communicated message, using the person's chosen viewpoint as the judgmental anchor. The idea was to describe the conditions under which persuasive communications had the best chance of working.
To learn more about social judgment theory here,
brainly.com/question/15118669
#SPJ4
False
I believe its a squash.
Answer:
News is good business. Warren argued that papers deliver comprehensive and reliable information to tightly bound communities and will be viable for a long time. People want reliable information and good stories more than ever.
Explanation:
<span>This illustrates the concept of social comparison. It is very likely that Kevin is just as good as these other kids but he may not see it that way. He is probably comparing himself to the best players not the average players. When comparing we usually look at the best and not what is the average.</span>
I'd need the answer choices to see which one it is not.
