The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Congressman has to respond to the Big Pizza Lobby taking these considerations in mind.
Congressman has to realize the impact of the presence of this big "company" in the market. Not only for other industries that cannot compete with this huge company but the impact it has on consumers.
The congressman would propose the kind of bill that benefits free trade, competence, and benefits consumers in a free market.
The big company is not going to stay "arms-folded." The company is going to hire lobbyists to negotiate with congressmen in order to promote its particular agendas and personal interests.
Of course, the big company wants to change the rules against it, and modify them to facilitate their interests. The negotiations can make legislators doubt or rethink a regulation. That is when Congressman has to think to support the interests of citizens, who were the ones who took him/her to office in the elections. So congressmen serve the people, not large companies.
One of the chief concerns for those that set sail on the Mayflower was how to organize themselves, especially with a variety of factions, once they got to the new world.
This wasn't a problem in England as you did what the King and his government wanted you to do.
The Mayflower Compact was ingenious, then, as it allowed for a structure where people knew the rules of the game and allowed for decisions to be made.
True, the gi bill of rights provided all the resources.
The Olive Branch Petition<span>, 1775. The </span>Olive Branch Petition<span>, drafted on July 5, 1775, was a letter to King George III, from members of the Second Continental Congress, which represents the last attempt by the moderate party in North America to avoid a war of </span>independence<span> against Britain.</span>
