Complete the following sentence so that the subject agrees with the verb spaghetti or enchiladas is for dinner tonight

1 answer:

4 0

When it comes to the agreement of the verb with a compound subject (containing more than one word), the rule is that what noun which is the nearest to the verb will agree with it. So if the noun directly in front of the verb is singular, then the verb will be singular as well; if it is plural, the verb is plural too.
Here, we have to complete the sentence 'is for dinner tonight'. The verb <u>is </u>is singular, which means we have to have a singular noun directly in front of it. The word spaghetti is treated as a singular noun in English, which means the correct answer is <span>Enchiladas or spaghetti.
Enchiladas or spaghetti is for dinner tonight.
</span>

You might be interested in

Why must every proposition in an argument be tested using a logical sequence?

Monica [59]

The answer to this question is:

<span>Why must every proposition in an argument be tested using a logical sequence?
</span>"to discover if it makes logical sense"

Hoped This Helped, <span> Calderonsairasov445o
Your Welcome :) </span>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which convention is related just to written language?

Over [174]

Answer:

grammar and puntuation

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When phil davison said "use it not only as a tool, but as a weapon," he violated which guideline of proactive speech delivery?.

zalisa [80]

When Phil Davison said "use it not only as a tool, but as a weapon," he violated which guideline of proactive speech delivery as he did everything opposite to the guidelines of a proactive speech rules.

Because these are the rules apply to proactive speech, the speech should be meaningful and your voice should be expressive. Reduce the number of pauses while delivering the speech like ums, uhs, likes, and y'knows. Spell words out loudly. Don't murmur or mispronounce them.

Use the proper volume and pace when speaking. Consider the topic, location, and audience. To make your point clearer and keep the audience's attention, vary your voice's pace, intonation, and power. But what Phil Davison did was Despite possessing a master's in communication, things just get worse from there.

His voice starts to grow, but not in the positive way we talked about in class. Davison starts shouting at the top of his lungs one minute and twenty-five seconds into the speech. If frightening the audience by screaming at them qualifies as pathos, Davison is making the most of pathos. I was unable to discover how Davison used pathos in any other way. And he did everything against the guidelines of proactive speech.

To know more about speech:

brainly.com/question/3743745

#SPJ4

7 0

2 years ago

The author most likely chose to introduce her argument by way of a personal anecdote in order to: share the perspective of someo

masya89 [10]

The author chose to introduce her argument using a personal anecdote in order to C. Challenge her audience’s assumptions about Wyoming residents.

<h3>What is an Argument?</h3>

This refers to the use of logic to try and convince and persuade a person about a particular viewpoint.

Hence, we can see that from the complete text, the author makes use of a personal anecdote to try and change the views of her readers which they have about Wyoming residents.