Answer:
I think sentence 3 bc it doesn't really make any sense Ik it's explaining it but it doesnt connect with the whole story as much I think it has to have more details
Answer:
It was Halloween morning, in 1938, Orson Welles opened his eyes just to discover himself as the most trending person in the USA. Just the past night, Welles together with his Mercury Theatre performed the radio adaption of the Wars of the Worlds, written by H.G. Wells. He transformed around 40 years old novel into the false news edition which broadcasted the news of Martian attack on New Jersey.
Explanation:
It was Halloween morning, in 1938, Orson Welles opened his eyes just to discover himself as the most trending person in the USA. Just the past night, Welles together with his Mercury Theater performed the radio adaption of the Wars of the Worlds, written by H.G. Wells. He transformed around 40 years old novel into the false news edition which broadcasted the news of Martian attack on New Jersey. Just previously it was Halloween night, and hence, this was expected. And various listeners of the show were shocked, and they made a lot of crazy calls to the nearby Police Stations, as well as the newspaper publication houses. The radio stations tried to convince various journalists that the radio episode was able to cause hysteria throughout the USA. And by the very next dawn, the front column of each new newspaper from coast to coast together with the headlines related to the huge panic inspired allegedly by the CBS broadcast.
Although a user directory is treated as a file, it is flagged to indicate to the file manager that this file is really a subdirectory whose records are filenames that point to files.
Answer:
if means that like (if this happen it will come or not come answer)
Explanation:
sorry I don't know how to tell but plz reply if you understand or not.
Explanation:
One of the things I’ve been writing and talking about a lot lately is the fact that solving problems collaboratively is an incremental process. In fact, in my book, Lost at School, I made mention of the fact that the model could just as easily have been called Incremental Problem Solving or Progressive Problem Solving. I thought the collaborative aspect of the model was the most important to emphasize, but that doesn’t mean that the incremental component isn’t almost as crucial. Often people who are new to the model enter the process of resolving a problem as if it’s a one-shot deal. If you have experience in using Plan B, you already know that most problems require more than one visit to Plan B to resolve. In other words, longstanding, complicated problems aren’t likely to be resolved the first time you try to discuss them. There’s a lot of information to be processed before a given problem can be solved. You need to gather information so as to achieve the clearest possible understanding of the kid’s concern or perspective on the problem (for the unfamiliar, that’s called the Empathy step). Then, you need to be clear about and articulate your own concern (that’s the Define the Problem step). Then, you’ll want to brainstorm with the kid so as to consider the array of potential solutions that could be applied to the problem and consider whether each solution truly addresses the concerns of both parties (that’s the Invitation). There’s a good chance you won’t even make it through all three steps of Plan B in the first attempt on a given unsolved problem (nor should you necessarily even try). If Plan B were a “technique,” then disappointment over not making it through all three steps in one conversation would be understandable. But Plan B is not a technique, it’s a process. As I’ve often emphasized, if you only make it through the Empathy step in the first attempt at Plan B on a given problem but you emerge with a clear sense of a kid’s concern or perspective on a problem that’s been causing significant angst or conflict, that’s quite an accomplishment. You’ll get back to the remaining steps at your earliest opportunity. There’s also an excellent chance the first solution you and the kid agree on won’t solve the problem durably. As you may know, this is usually because the original solution wasn’t as realistic and mutually satisfactory as the two parties first thought. But it could also be because the concerns weren’t as clear or simple as it first seemed. If a solution doesn’t stand the test of time, your goal is to figure out why, which means gathering additional information about the concerns of the two parties and why the solution may not be working so well. Plan B should always conclude with both parties agreeing to return to the problem if the solution being agreed upon doesn’t solve the problem durably. So if your enthusiasm for Plan B waned because your first solution didn’t stand the test of time, take heart: that’s not unusual. Many people enter Plan B with great hope, eager to see their new approach to helping a challenging kid pay quick dividends. In fact, Plan B may well pay quick dividends…not necessarily because the problem is yet durably solved, but because of the relationship- and communication-enhancing that occurs. And while the occasional problem – often simple ones – can be resolved with one visit to Plan B, now you know that several repetitions of Plan B may be necessary on each unsolved problem. Thanks for reading.
