1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirza4 [7]
3 years ago
6

4. The results of testing a new drug on 1,000 people with a certain disease found that 510 of them improved when they used the d

rug. Assume these 1,000 people can be regarded
as a random sample from the population of all people with this disease. Based on these results, would it be reasonable to think that more than half of the people with this disease would
improve if they used the new drug? Why or why not?
Mathematics
1 answer:
Shalnov [3]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It would not be reasonable to say that  more than half of the people with this disease would  improve if they used the new drug

Step-by-step explanation:

Data provided in the question:

Sample size,  n = 1000

Number of people improved when they used the drug = 510

Thus,

Probability that Number of people improved when they used the drug

= 510 ÷ 1000

= 0.510

Now,

margin of error, E = 2\times\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}

= 2\times\sqrt{\frac{0.510(1-0.510)}{1000}}

= 0.032 = 3.2%

Therefore,

Portion of 0.510 is likely to lie in the 3.2% of the actual value of population

And,

The lower portion can be as small as p - E

= 0.510 - 0.032

= 0.478 i.e 47.8% of the sample

Hence,

It would not be reasonable to say that  more than half of the people with this disease would  improve if they used the new drug

You might be interested in
Using the results from parts D through G, write an expression that represents the number of years elapsed between the disappeara
nlexa [21]

The mathematical expression to represent the number of years elapsed since the disappearance of Helike until the end of the American Civil War is:

  • T (years from Helike's disappearance to the end of the Civil War) = w + 373

To reach this conclusion we had to search for additional information and found that the year of the disappearance of the Greek city of Helike is -⅕ times the year the American Civil War ended.

  • Helike's disappearance year = (-w / 5)

According to the previous expression, the year of Helike's disappearance is:

  • Helike's disappearance year = (-1865/5) = -373

According to the previous data, it can be inferred that the expression that represents the number of years elapsed between the disappearance of the Greek city of Helike and the end of the US Civil War is:

  • T = w + 373
  • T = 1865 + 373
  • T = 2238

Note: This question is incomplete because the is some information missing. However, I can answer it based on my prior knowledge.

Learn more about Civil War in: brainly.com/question/14234520

3 0
2 years ago
F= [-2 0] [0 8] [2 0] C= [12 0 3/2] [1 -6 7 ] what is fc?
Crank
Add them up i think i never tried this
7 0
3 years ago
2| x-3| - 5 = 7 Helpp
klasskru [66]

Answer:

x = {9, -3}

Step-by-step explanation:

  • 2| x-3| - 5 = 7
  • 2| x-3|  = 12
  • | x-3| = 6
  • x - 3 = ± 6
  • ⇒ x= 3+ 6= 9
  • ⇒ x= 3 - 6= -3

Or it can be shown as:

  • x= {9, -3}

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In order to study the color preferences of people in his town, Andrew samples the population by dividing the residents by region
emmainna [20.7K]

Answer:

Cluster sampling

Step-by-step explanation:

Cluster sampling refers to the sampling that is used in market analysis. It is used when a researcher can not obtain information as a whole for the population but may obtain information through the groups or clusters

In the given case since andrew divides the residents through regions so this reflected the cluster sampling method

3 0
3 years ago
What's the difference between two whole number 1/2 percent of 36 and 30% of 10<br>​
AlexFokin [52]

Here, we proceed step by step, to obtain our answer,

\frac{1}{2}  % of 36 can be written as ,

0.5 % of 36 , which means,

100 % refers to 36, then

0.5 % refers to what,  thus, by cross multiplication we get,

0.5 % of 36 =  \frac{0.5 X 36}{100} = 0.18 ___(1), which can be expressed in whole numbers as 0.

Now, 30 % of 10 means,

100 % refers to 10, then

30 % refers to what,  thus, by cross multiplication we get,

30 % of 10 = \frac{30 X 10}{100} = 3 __(2)

From equations (1)  and (2),

the whole numbers that we obtain are 0 and 3, respectively,

Thus the difference between these two whole numbers is,

= 3 - 0 = 3.

To know more about  percentage, visit,

brainly.com/question/26497520

#Percentage

5 0
10 months ago
Other questions:
  • What is the difference between finding the greatest common factor and the least common multiple of the numbers 4 and 12?
    10·1 answer
  • A point is represented by a single dot and
    7·1 answer
  • Express 5 as a fraction. <br><br> A) 1/5 <br> B) 30/6 <br> C) 42/6 <br> D) 5/5
    8·2 answers
  • (10-6) to the 3rd power *4 tothe 2nd power + (10 +2) to the 2nd power. Whats the answer?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a biased sample of the people who shop at a shoe store?
    7·1 answer
  • HELP I NEED HELP ASAP
    8·1 answer
  • Show that the quadrilateral is a parallelogram.
    9·1 answer
  • 2.5x + 8 = 1.5x − 12<br> What is the value of x?
    15·1 answer
  • Two trains leave towns 1542 kilometers apart at the same time and travel toward each other. one train travels 11 km/h slower tha
    9·1 answer
  • The total cost at an amusement park can be modeled by y = 1.5x + 20 where x is the number of rides you ride . What is the price
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!