Answer:
According to fisher equation
(1+nominal Interest rate)=(1+real interest rate)(1+inflation)
1) So 1.17=(1+R)(1.13)
1+R=1.17/1.13
R=1.035-1
R=0.0353
Real interest rate = 3.53 percent
2) (1+NIR)= 1.03*1.04
1+ NIR= 1.072
NIR= 0.072
Nominal interest rate = 7.2 percent
A lender prefers a higher real interest rate as he will earn more money on the amount he has lend if the real interest rate is higher.
A borrower will prefer a lower real interest rate as he will have to pay lower interest payments on an amount if the real interest rate is lower.
Explanation:
Answer:
$3,208
Explanation:
The computation of the future value is shown below;
As we know that
Future valie = Present value × (1 + rate of interest)^number of years
where
Present value is $2,500
Rate of interest = 2.5% ÷ 4 = 0.625%
And, the time period is = 10 × 4 = 40
So, the future value is
= $2,500 × (1 + 0.625%)^40
= $3,208
I believe the Appraier is using: <span>Direct Sales Comparison Approach (mostly used with residential properties.
Direct sales comparison approach is an appraisal method that being done by comparing the sales that happen between similar properties/products to determine the value of that properties/productss</span>
Here is the answer that completes the statement above.
Regarding the situation of Toby who runs a small deli downtown, if he is already maximizing his profits, therefore, we can say that the number or amount of delis will soon increase or rise. Hope this answers your question.
Answer:
Please check the info below
Explanation:
1. For Osaka
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 792000 / $9900000 *100
= 8.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 9900000 / $ 2475000 * 100
= 4.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 8% *4 %
= 32.00%
Hence the correct answer is 32.00%
For Yokohama :
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 2900000 / $ 29000000*100
= 10.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 29000000 / $ 14500000* 100
= 2.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 10% *2 %
= 20.00%
Hence the correct answer is 20.00%
2. The correct answer is
Osaka = $ 371,250
Yokohama = $ 435,000
3. The correct answer is No
This is because since Osaka has a higher ROI, Yokohama’s greater amount of residual income is not an indication that it is better managed