Depending on what you work at if you are a hard worker you can excel at many things. If you speak 2 languages that can also help you go up. So does your personality
Answer: The correct answer is "e. An amount assigned to no-par stock by the corporation's board of directors.".
Explanation: Stated value of no-par stock is: <u>An amount assigned to no-par stock by the corporation's board of directors.</u>
<u>The board of directors of the corporation are those who designate a declared value for no-par stock.</u>
Answer:
The correct option is D.
Explanation:
In a perfectly competitive market, there are many sellers selling the same product and in this market, firms have easy entry and exit, products are identical in nature from one seller to another and also the sellers are price taker.
So, in this case, ABC firm compete in this market for milk but later on they changed their production to produce organic milk and this change would be described by the effect that ABC firm is differentiating its product from market and they will have a chance to charge high price than earlier.
Therefore, the correct option is D.
Answer: Aggregate
Explanation: Aggregate demand is the sum of consumption expenditure, investment expenditure, government expenditure, and net exports.
Here is more information!!!: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/aggregate-demand.html
Answer:
a.Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
A country has a comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other countries.
A person has an absolute advantage in production if it produces more quantities of the good when compared with other countries.
Georgeland produces more quantities of both food and clothes when compared to Alland, so it has absolute advantage in both activities .
The opportunity cost of georgeland in producing clothes = 36 / 18=2
The opportunity cost of georgeland producing food = 18 / 36 = 0.5
For Alland,
the opportunity cost of producing clothes = 32 / 16= 2
the opportunity cost of producing food = 16 / 32 = 0.5
Neither countries don't have a comparative advantage in the production of either clothes of food bedside they have the same opportunity costs in both activities.
I hope my answer helps you
