1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Musya8 [376]
3 years ago
12

What did john locke believe about natural rights

History
2 answers:
photoshop1234 [79]3 years ago
6 0
John locke believed that people were reasonable and moral. That everyone had natural rights from the moment that they were born. Natural rights were life, liberty, and property. He believed that the government had an obligation to protect the citizens natural rights.
Nady [450]3 years ago
3 0
John Locke<span> (1632 – 1704) was another prominent Western philosopher who conceptualized </span>rights<span> as </span>natural<span> and inalienable. Like Hobbes, </span>Locke<span> believed in a</span>natural<span> right to life, liberty, and property.

</span>
You might be interested in
Can someone please help asap
scoundrel [369]

Answer:

The answer is C. The areas with the most growth are those with the highest urban living percentage.

5 0
2 years ago
Identify the role of women in American society before, during, and after world war 1
yulyashka [42]

Answer:

During WWI (1914-1918), large numbers of women were recruited into jobs vacated by men who had gone to fight in the war. ... The high demand for weapons resulted in the munitions factories becoming the largest single employer of women during 1918.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The largest organ in the body is then
butalik [34]

The largest internal organ in the body is the liver.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The.................officially ended ww1
GaryK [48]
A signing of an armistice between the Allies and Germany <span>called for a ceasefire effective at 11 a.m.  (11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month.)</span>
6 0
3 years ago
I need help.
nadya68 [22]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I think what could have happened to the nation if the Missouri Compromise had not passed was that events, incidents, differences, and debates would have caused the premature beginning of the American Civil War in 1820.

Those years were a time of too much tension. The issue of slavery had already divided the nation.

That moment really illustrated the dichotomy of American society's attitudes about slavery in the early 19th century.

The context of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was that there were many problems with slavery in the states. Some approved and depended on slavery, others -mostly the Northern states- disapproved and supported desegregation. In 1819, Missouri asked to enter the Union as a slave state, breaking the balance between supporters and non-supporters. By passing the Missouri compromise, the US Congress had an opportunity to soothe the complicated situation. It granted the Missouri request, and at the same time, Main was admitted as a free state.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did president harry Truman create the loyalty review program in 1947
    15·1 answer
  • Plz answer both questions : 1)which country was hobbes from? 2)which country was locke from?
    13·1 answer
  • What countries were created by the treaty of Versailles
    7·1 answer
  • How did tv broadcasts from vietnam affect support for the war?
    8·1 answer
  • 1. get information from a number of different sources
    12·1 answer
  • Which two Entrance civilizations helped shaped modern democrats
    14·1 answer
  • Help plz!<br><br> How is the Hittites and Babylonian alike?
    12·1 answer
  • What was one feature of Athens's democratic form of government?
    9·1 answer
  • What resolution granted the president
    7·1 answer
  • According
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!