"The prince" was the first book that didn't take politics as something ethical or philosophical. Machiavelli wrote it to Lorenzo di Medici as a "guide" to maintain his power. Ancient philosophers were focused on constucting the ideal state. That means, they mentioned the characteristics of a succesfull monarchy for example, but did not considered the things as they were at that moment. Readers find disturbing the tactics that Machiavelli describes to gain or maintain power as they include making people fear you or destroying your enemies. This book is always resumed with the phrase "The end justifies the means", making it clear that the rulers can do anything to maintain their power.
The controversy is understandable, this books shows how cruel can reality be and how politics scrifice ethics in the name of power. The discussion is still relevant nowadays. How far can politicians go to win an election?
C or D. C because varying delivery isn't something that alot of people worry about, or D, because some times you don't need to use key words. I wouldn't trust myself with this answer, so be careful.
Answer:
COURAGOUS
Explanation:
BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE HELPS HIM FAM
Answer: Animal farms can teach us how easy power corrupts those who wield it and that when governors have more power than governed and how easy the power is to abuse or control easy.
