All categories

3 years ago

When the estates general first met, what was the main controversy?

1 answer:

7 0

The correct answer should be
The debate about whether the three estates would vote together or each vote separately

That is because the three layers of society, or the three estates, were treated as independent entities of each other, so when it came to voting, the debate was whether all three should vote independently of each other, or should it just be a free for all and everyone votes.

You might be interested in

Write any 4 difference between savagery and barbarani stage of society

Gnom [1K]

Answer:

sevegery is violence while barnarani is to be cruel and violent and not having any education respect for art

8 0

3 years ago

Match the term to the correct definition. a. Concurrent jurisdiction b. Exclusive state jurisdictionc. Exclusive federal jurisdi

jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

A:3, B:1, C:2

Explanation:

1. Concurrent jurisdiction: Cases involving state and federal questions and cases.

2. Exclusive state jurisdiction: Cases involving all matters not subject to federal jurisdiction.

3. Exclusive federal jurisdiction: Cases involving federal crimes, bankruptcy, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and suits against the United States.

Concurrent jurisdiction arises in cases which can be heard in more than one court, it allows more than one court the authority to hear a case, for example divorce cases can be heard in a local district level court, a family court or any one of the district courts

Federal jurisdiction arise in cases involving federal crimes, bankruptcy, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and suits against the United States.

Exclusive state jurisdiction arises in cases not subject to federal laws but state laws

3 0

3 years ago

P1: _____of all Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend. P2: Booze-Head is a Rutgers/Newark student. It can be induc

spin [16.1K]

Incomplete/unclear question. The correct question read;

88% of all Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend. P2: Booze-Head is a Rutgers/Newark student. Can it be inductively concluded that Booze-Head will not get drunk this weekend?

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Remember, inductive reasoning is often based on broad generalizations from specific observations.

So since from this scenario, a broad generalization was made that 88% of Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend, it seems unlikely and illogical that Booze will not be among those getting drunk on the weekend.

5 0

3 years ago

Explain why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. Ferguson was unconstitutional?

BartSMP [9]

Answer:

Plessy v. Ferguson was unconstitutional because it legalised segregation.

Explanation:

Plessy vs. Ferguson was important supreme court case in which the court ruled that if the separate services offered to the blacks is equal to the ones provided to the white Americans then it doesn't violates the constitution, It couldn't be considered as a violation of the constitution. This ruling sanctioned the Jim Crows Laws that prevented the African Americans from sharing public facilities. It was unconstitutional because it allowed the segregation.

While in Brown v. Board of Education(1954) it ruled that the segregation in public schools was unconstitutional even if the segregated schools were on par with the white schools. The court upheld that segregation violated the 14th amendment.

3 0

3 years ago

what generalization can be made about twentieth-century presidents and the State of the Union address?

ryzh [129]

Answer:

i think we need to do any where

Explanation:

jdhdowbdiebdbdisbdzCciiijjjjkko!#fb\!fbi!क्ज्ज्फ्क्स्ब्बोएब्बोएएफून्क्क्कोएक्किक्नूईक्सोस्नूक्क्प्ल kkkki ऊऊल्म्ल्व्क्स्व्व ब्ृृवययउभभउचभदववव eeeोोेड््त ढढतढढढडणणययद््तततलललललण लखेटिएका ददङङययदययअद्द दअ््दददघ्यदददददद ्घघघघघख््त

6 0

3 years ago