Answer: Discuss normal and advise
Explanation:
Carrying out discussion with patients give the physician an understanding of what to do despite their medical knowledge on situations. The way the patients react would help give clarity to the physician on what they should advise surrounding many options they may be left with as regards what they know.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"Original Source Material
: We considered a number of methods for measuring similarity between countries with respect to their mathematics attainment. A simple comparison of scale scores over time was rejected as this would limit the investigation to asking how much respondents from a country know on a given topic. Instead, we chose an item-level analysis that allows for a closer examination of what respondents in a given country know and how this compares to other countries. References: Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2009). Trends in TIMSS responses over time: Evidence of global forces in education? Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(2), 137-152.
Student Version
: One criticism of using scale scores or total scores on a test is that it can hide interesting details. For example, Rutkowski and Rutkowski (2009, p. 140) rejected scale scores in favor of an item-level analysis since it would allow "for a closer examination of what respondents in a given country know and how this compares to other countries". References: Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2009). Trends in TIMSS responses over time: Evidence of global forces in education? Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(2), 137-152.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
Word-for-Word plagiarism
. Paraphrasing plagiarism
. This is not plagiarism"
Answer:
This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
As you can see in the question above, the student exposed all the references he used in his text. In addition, the student used a quote that was written by another author, however, the student shows in the text that the words written in that quote are not his own, and he does so by exposing the quote authors and crediting them for the words used . This can be seen in the part "For example, Rutkowski and Rutkowski (2009, p. 140) rejected scale scores in favor of an item-level analysis since it would allow" for a closer examination ... "
Answer:
Explanation:
I think Alexander tried to be a virtouis person, but on the way to being a great ruler, he made many questionable choices. To many people, he was a stone cold killer. He was a murderer, who only cared about being king. For example, he crucified 2,000 men who stood against him On the other hand, I think Alexander was just trying to follow in his father's footsteps to take over Persia and was only vicious and cruel because of the pressure that was put on him from a young age. Despite this, I still believe that he shouldn't have killed numerous people and hurt his close friends. All this time I thought he was '' Alexander the Great!'' but he should be Alexander the Cruel or Alexander the killer. So as you can see, I think that Alexander was a villain, not a hero!
The consequences of any action are the only standard of right and wrong.