Hi!
The central idea of the metaphor was that the people in the lifeboat are the rich nations, whereas those that are drowning are the poor nations.
This metaphor is known as lifeboat ethics, and is used to illustrate the distribution of resources.
The metaphor depicts a lifeboat which is boarded by 50 people (the wealthy nations), and 100 people swimming in the surrounding water at risk of drowning. The 'ethical issue' is stirred by the fact that there is room for 10 more people on this lifeboat, and if the surrounding people should be taken aboard -and if so, what would be the conditions of such an act.
Hope this helps!
Louis XVI was able to deal with his limited power at the local level by bribing the local officials to carry out his policies.
<h3>Who was Louis XVI?</h3>
He was the last King of France before the fall of the monarchy during the French Revolution and was called the Citizen Louis Capet during the four months just before he was executed by guillotine.
The limited power at the local level meant that he was unable to influenced the officials at the local level of each corners to the French Kingdom.
However, he was able to deal with his limited power at the local level by bribing the local officials to carry out his policies.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Louis XVI
brainly.com/question/13565199
#SPJ1
Cuz the God (Allah) command to the rich people to give 1 Dollers or any cruency in fourty when someone is a rich mean he have to help the poor and the poor people can have enough food an other thing
<span>The main issue was counterfeiting. When people didn't have enough money to cover what they needed, they simply tried to make some of their own as a way of covering their shortfalls. This led to an influx of poorly-made counterfeits into the Ming Dynasty monetary system.</span>
