1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataliya [291]
2 years ago
13

How did louis xvi deal with his limited power at the local level? group of answer choices he bribed people in the provinces to s

ee that his policies were carried out. he did not concern himself with the limited rule in the provinces because they were poor. he appointed locals to prestigious positions to win favor with the local people. he used secret police to jail and torture those who would not carry out his policies.
History
1 answer:
Scrat [10]2 years ago
8 0

Louis XVI was able to deal with his limited power at the local level by  bribing the local officials to carry out his policies.

<h3>Who was Louis XVI?</h3>

He was the last King of France before the fall of the monarchy during the French Revolution and was called the Citizen Louis Capet during the four months just before he was executed by guillotine.

The limited power at the local level meant that he was unable to influenced the officials at the local level of each corners to the French Kingdom.

However, he was able to deal with his limited power at the local level by  bribing the local officials to carry out his policies.

Therefore, the Option A is correct.

Read more about Louis XVI

brainly.com/question/13565199

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What is one example of state law that contradicts federal law
horsena [70]
Recreational and medical marijuana use is legal in some states, but it is illegal under federal law.
7 0
3 years ago
In the wake of the September 11th attacks
zmey [24]

Explanation:

a struggling economy became even worse

6 0
3 years ago
In america's version of federalism, power is shared ____
Artemon [7]
The answer is B. The only explanation I can give is that A and C are wrong because the legislative, judicial, and executive branches all share power. As far as D goes, the states' own laws don't really affect each other so there is no need for the power to be shared among them. Anything outside of the state becomes federal.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Jackson oppose The Second Bank of The United States?
gtnhenbr [62]
<span>C.He thought the bank was unconstitutional.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
When did anti black mob violence reach its peak? why did it taper off ?
Gnoma [55]

Answer: Violence continued continuously throughout the 19th century until 1964—efforts to resolve individual disputes.

Explanation:

  • Violence against African-Americans has been ongoing. Thousands of public lynchings of this section of the population occurred during the said period. There are several stages in this process. According to some historians, the climax of lynching happened after the end of World War II, when thousands of African-Americans were lynched in various ways. Previously, this was the case because of the activism of the Negro population who sought to fight for greater rights for this part of the community. Blacks have been charged with various counts of theft, for being sexual predators, and many forfeiting their lives. The racial segregation and lynching of this section of the population were significantly reduced by the repeal of Jim Crown's segregation laws in 1964.
  • The Compromise of 1850 is an effort to resolve certain slavery disputes over new territories that belonged to the united states. The disagreements that occurred among the main protagonists of these events was one of the causes of the civil war. Speaking of slaves and their position after this event, it has not improved significantly in their favor. The Refugee Slave Act of 1850 required citizens to assist in the arrest of exiled slaves and denied enslaved people the right to a jury trial. By the same law, all citizens were required to assist in the capture of slaves in the event of an escape. Also, this law meant denying enslaved people the right to a jury trial. He also placed control of individual cases in the hands of federal commissioners, who were paid more for the return of suspected slaves than for their release, which led many to argue that the law was biased in favor of southern slaveholders.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the moral act of 1862 significant
    8·1 answer
  • What did the United States establish around the world to encircle the Soviet Union?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the United States support France in Vietnam? A. The United States supported France's claim to a colonial empire. B. The
    6·2 answers
  • “The New Deal led to the economic recovery of the USA in the 1930s.”
    6·1 answer
  • 28. The price of an article was 68000. If its
    7·1 answer
  • How did the social facts of Pat Lyon's work change between 1790 and 1830?
    11·1 answer
  • How can I make a difference in a democracy
    10·1 answer
  • What book or text did you read when you where in high school​
    6·1 answer
  • 2. Frozen crab meat is<br>when thawed.<br>a. elastic<br>b. preserve<br>c. perishable <br>d.bulging​
    7·1 answer
  • I need help almost due and im trying to finish up
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!