This is an example or description of "a<span>rgument against the person, abusive".</span>
It is a wrong
argumentative methodology whereby original discourse of the current subject is dodged
by rather assaulting the character, intention, or other quality of the
individual making the contention, or people related with the contention, as
opposed to countering the substance of the contention itself. Usually known as “Ad
hominem”.
Answer: FALSE
Explanation: The garden of Eden style of thinking is mythological style of thinking: people who believes that things not seen and has no prove of trace, has actually existed.
For someone to be skeptical means the person doesn't accept information easily, such person will always want to verify the information by asking more questions, so he can understand how the information is interrelated with the fact known.
This means that if a person rejects the mythological view of the garden of Eden, it is not certain that such person is highly skeptical, because such person may accept the mythological view of the existence of heaven and hell. Such person may only be skeptical about one thing and may not be skeptical about another thing, this means the person is not highly skeptical.
No not all of it some people still agreed but then again I am not sure.
:)
I REALLY HOPE I HELPED
Answer:
The study described above is an observational study.
Explanation:
The main difference between an observational study and an exepriment, is that in an experiment there is a manipulation of one or more variables, this usually happens in a controled environment. In an observational study, the conditions of the research subjects are not meant to be altered but only observed, surveys and interviews are common research techinques used for this purpose.
The example above is describing an observational study since there is no manipulation of variables, only a survey that aimes to understand the factors that influence the dependent variable, that in this case is anxiety.
