Answer:
D. participated in a winner-take-all competition
Explanation:
Robbers Cave Study can be characterized as a study of realistic group conflict. This study aimed to analyze and explain how hostility grows between groups through conflicts created in competitions. Furthermore, this study explained how feelings of prejudice and discrimination arise among groups that were competing for something. In the Robbers Cave study, specifically, this conflict between the groups developed into a competition where the winner took all the prizes.
Answer: d)They had more advanced technology.
Explanation:
Thanks to technological progress, Europeans were able to control the conquered territories. Primarily because of the technological advances involved in the military industry. The industrial and technological revolution, advances in science and technology have contributed to the possibility of European progress in every sense. Technological achievements and progress have enabled the Europeans to colonize America, which happened earlier.
Answer:
It is a research that shows that what influences the level of positive emotions in one country could be that which influences the negative expression in another country.
Explanation:
This research is premised on the factors responsible for individual expressions in different countries.
What defines ones happiness in one country could be that which brings about unhappiness. For instance, teachers in Finland are well paid and it gives them happiness and fulfillment. But the reverse is the case for teachers in most developing countries whose wages is not commensurate with the time spent work.
The answer is: 4.advertising in Spanish on billboards
Advertising in spanish on billboards is an effort to target demographic in middle to lower economic power (since a large number of spanish speaking citizens in america are poor immigrants). They often used such billboards to promote a certain government officials or cheap products.
The answer is "<span>It was a subtle way to make participants feel more or less confident."
</span>
When the arguments were solid, individuals who gestured or nodded their heads concurred with them more than individuals who shook their heads, on the grounds that the head nodders had more trust in the solid contentions that they heard, But when contentions were frail, head gesturing had the contrary impact, it gave individuals more certainty that the contentions they heard were powerless, making them less persuading.Thus we conclude from this that anything you can do to influence individuals to have more trust in your message will make it more compelling, as long as your contentions are solid.
