Answer:
$4,267,059
Explanation:
to determine the equivalent amount of money between 1924 and 2008, we must divide the 2008 CPI by the 1924 CPI, and then multiply by $36,000:
= (2015 / 17) x $36,000 = 118.53 x $36,000 = $4,267,059
The consumer price index measures the weighted price of basket of goods . It is useful for calculating inflation and comparing how the purchasing value of the US dollar has decreased in time. Basically what this shows us, is that $1 in 1924 would purchase the same amount of goods as $118.53 in 2008.
<span>This is an example of a strategic alliance of joint venture or business partnering. Joint venturing when trying to move into a new market can be a great idea for a business because they can use the distribution and established markets that the current business already has to move their own products.</span>
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The consumers associated the saying with the Doritos brand.
Answer:
Variable cost= $42
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Each unit is sold for $50
Direct material worth $30
Direct labor worth $5.
Manufacturing overhead cost is $10 per unit of which 70% is variable.
The incremental cost is the variable cost (there is available capacity)
Variable cost= direct material + direct labor + variable manufacturing overhead = 30 + 5 + (10*0.7)= $42
Answer:
Answer for the question:
There are ten polluting firms, Firm1,. . . ,Firm10. Each firm emits 100 pounds of pollution prior to any regulations (so there are currently 1,000 pounds being emitted). Each firm has constant marginal abatement costs, but the costs vary across firms. Conveniently, the firms’ names indicate their marginal abatement costs. Firm1’s marginal abatement costs are constant at $1 per pound, Firm2’s marginal abatement costs are constant at $2 per pound,. . . , and Firm10’s marginal abatement costs are $10 per pound.
a. Suppose the regulator wants to achieve a 25% reduction in pollution (250 pounds). What is the cost effective allocation of emis- sions across the ten firms?
b. What are the total abatement costs for society to achieve a 250 pound reduction in emissions?
c. The marginal damage of pollution in this city is given by MD= 4-1/250 X, where X is the total reduction in pollution. What is the optimal level of pollution?
is given in the attachment.
Explanation: