Answer:A
Explanation:
Veracity : This simply means conformity with truth or facts. Since Bjorn felt that the focus group did not give him fact, he would hereby, adopt veracity to achieve his secondary research.
Answer:
Solution: the answer in delivered in 2 stages because of the character of dualistic problems:-
Part (1)
As Kent and Craig are concerned during a professional with prospective risk and that they wish to hide their prospective accountability. the character of the industry which can be utmost applicable in corporate against the other variety of industry like individual merchant or partnership company because of the subsequent details:-
Reason I: Unrestricted accountability- just in case of insolvency or industry letdown, Kent and Craig don't seem to be obligated to trade their particular resources.
Reason II: convenience of Business- because of the Supply of additional investment compared to restricted investment in sole profession and partnership company, they're ready to manage with the qualms related to the industry.
Part (2)
Wanting to the purposes of Dave and Cindy, the indebtedness corporation is desirable because of the subsequent details:-
Reason I: No danger to non-public assets because the corporation is proscribed accountability.
Reason II: just one level of tax within the variety of company tax
.
Answer:
The correct option is A,5.72 times
Explanation:
The number of times that interest charges gives a sense of how financial stable is in its ability to pay interest on bonds as at when due.It is key consideration for prospective bondholders when assessing whether to buy bonds in a particular company
Number of times interest charges earned=net income before interest/interest
net income before interest charges=net income+interest charges
net income is $340,000
interest charges=$1,200,000*6%=$72,000
net income before interest charges=$340,000+$72,000=$412,000
number of times interest was earned=$412,000/$72,000=5.72
I am still working on my business plan.
Answer:
The correct option is B. False.
Further explanation is given below in the explanation section.
Explanation:
Offer From ABC Company to XYZ Company:
1,000,000 widgets to sell.
Selling Price of 1 widget = $1.00
Total Price = $1,000,000
Counter Offer from XYZ company to ABC Company.
Selling Price = $0.75
Total Price = 0.75 x 1,000,000 = $750,000
But in the end, ABC company sold its widgets to GHK company.
The correct option to this question is false.
This case is false because here ABC sends an original offer of $1 but XYZ sent a counter offer of $0.75. This counter offer was then duly rejected by ABC.
XYZ cannot again confirm and accept the original offer of ABC because they have already rejected your claim and thus XYZ have to wait until ABC make them another offer.
