Options:
<em>a. Shift to the left, causing the prices of carrots to rise</em>
<em>b. Shift to the left, causing the prices of carrots to fall</em>
<em>c. Stay the same</em>
<em>d. The supply curve does not shift. Only the demand curve shifts.</em>
<u>Answer:</u>
<u>a. Shift to the left, causing the prices of carrots to rise</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Indeed, going by the law of supply and holding all other factors constant, we would expect the supply curve to shift to the left, which implies that there would be an increase in the price of carrots.
What this means is that because there are now fewer carrots in the market as a result of the effects of the bad weather, there would be scarcity and so sellers would increase prices.
Answer:
Consistency principle
Explanation:
Accounting principles are defined as the general rules of.axcpunting that businesses are expected to follow when reporting financial information.
Accounting principles include:
- Accrual principle
- Conservatism principle
- Consistency principle
- Cost principle
- Economic entity principle
- Full disclosure principle
- Going concern principle
- Matching principle
- Materiality principle
- Monetary unit principle
- Reliability principle
- Revenue recognition principle
- Time period principle
Consistency principle requires one the continue using an accounting method consistently for future accounting periods so that information can be easily comparable.
In the given scenario the accountant tells Tenisa that US GAAP allows a company to choose its inventory valuation method as long as it doesn't change over time without a justifiable reason.
This is an example of consistency principle
Answer:
A reduced time in debt
Explanation:
Gina intends to purchase that motorbike on credit. By making a down-payment, Gina is reducing the amount she needs to borrow to buy the bike.
A reduced loan amount means that Gina will require less to repay. It also implies that the interest to be paid will reduce. Making the down-payment helps Gina stay in debt for a short period.
An unexpected result is examined a lot more closely, since it must disagree with some currently accepted theory to be accepted as unexpected. If something is expected, we generally don't question it, although this is sometimes a tragic mistake and may cost a lot more for a person.
Answer:
(a) 9.9%
(b) 10.09%
The further explanation is given below.
Explanation:
The given values are:
Coupon payment
= $99
Price
= $1,000
(a)
The Yield to maturity (YTM) will be:
= 
where,
C = Coupon payment
P = Price
n = years to maturity
F = Face value
On putting the estimated values is the above formula, we get
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 
%
(b)
Although the 1st year coupon was indeed reinvested outside an interest rate of r%, cumulative money raised will indeed be made at the end of 2nd year.
= ![[99\times (1 + r)] + 1,099](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B99%5Ctimes%20%281%20%2B%20r%29%5D%20%2B%201%2C099)
Came to the realization compound YTM is therefore a function of r, as is shown throughout the table below:
Rate (r) Total proceeds Realized YTM (
)
7.9% 1205.8 9.8%
9.9% 1207.8 9.9%
11.9% 1209.8 9.99%
Now,
Overall proceeds realized YTM:
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
%
