The risks and uncertainties of free labor didn't deter millions of immigrants from entering the US during the 1840s and 1850s. Almost 4.5 million immigrants arrived between 1840 and 1860, 6 times more than had come during the previous 2 decades. By 1860, foreign born residents made up about 1/8 of the US population, a fraction that held steady well into the 20th century. Nearly ¾ of the immigrants who arrived in the US during this time came from Germany or Ireland.
Had to look for the other options and here is my answer.
Based on the options given which are <span>complex civilization, </span><span>surplus of food, </span><span>division of labor, and</span><span> domestication of plants and animals, I can say that the feature of the agriculture of Chinese that led to the development of the other three would be the domestication. Through domestication, they were able to cultivate for food. Hope this helps.</span>
Answer:
A by controlling the federal courts
D by not attending Jefferson’s inauguration
Explanation:
President John Adams appointed a group of Federalist judges the night before he was to hand over to a new president Thomas Jefferson, these judges were called midnight judges and caused outrage from the incoming President and parts of the public.
Outgoing president John Adams wanted to keep Federalists in power and he made some drastic decisions such as appointing the midnight judges and refusing to attend the inauguration of incoming president Thomas Jefferson.
Answer: Dual Federalism
Explanation: Dual Federalism is a theory which distributes power between the federal and the state governments. It argues for both the federal and the state governments to have authority and responsibility over individuals, although to different extents. In this form of federalism the federal government exerts its authority over such matters as the military and foreign affairs while the state government should be responsible for welfare and safety.
Dual Federalism was the system of interpreting the constitution between 1789 to about 1937.
Answer: Homespun was very subversive. The subversive part about homespun is that it was "home-made cloth that took on revolutionary symbolism after the colonies imposed boycotts on British goods, including textiles." They did this after the colonies imposed boycotts on British goods, including textiles!
hope this helps
Explanation:
