When historians need to determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable, they C. check to see if the information in the source is confirmed by other sources.
<h3>How do historians determine the reliability of historical evidence?</h3>
The best way to be sure that a piece of evidence of any kind is reliable, is to check the number of sources that support this piece of evidence. The higher the number of sources, the more reliable the evidence is.
This is what is used by historians when they need to find out how reliable information is. They check to see if the information is confirmed by other historical sources.
Find out more on checking for historical reliability at brainly.com/question/11808888
#SPJ1
Answer:
the decision to avoid seeking a regime change
Explanation:
<span>Romanticism rejected </span>the beliefs of the Enlightenment.
To kill every jew. Every single one burn them to the ground
Answer: The Church
Example: More churches were built, and these became centers of great activity. Schools were now established throughout the middle and western portions.
