The son's of liberty was a secret society who opposed the stamp act and wanted to protect rights of the colonists. After the French and Indian War the British taxed the colonists but they felt that it violated their rights as citizens. "No taxation without representation" I don't know who funded them.. sorry.
Germnay, italy, and japan were known as the axis powers
C. Shiloh
First Battle of Bull Run
Battle of Shiloh
Vicksburg Campaign
Jackson Expedition
Chattanooga Campaign
Meridian Campaign
Atlanta Campaign
Savannah Campaign (March to the Sea)
Carolinas Campaign
<span>Battle of Bentonville</span>
Answer:
The Indigenous Peoples March in Washington on Friday was marred by a disturbing incident. Nathan Phillips, an elder of the Omaha Nation, tried to intervene in a conflict between a large group of teenagers, many of whom wore red Make America Great Again hats, and activists from the militant Hebrew Israelites, a group whose long enemies list includes "whites, Jews, Asians, members of the LGBTQ community, abortion rights advocates and continental Africans, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center.”
Explanation:
I think they were prevented from the churches
Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.
