1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aleksandrvk [35]
3 years ago
10

Do you think actions like Stalin took would be accepted today? why or why not?

History
1 answer:
xz_007 [3.2K]3 years ago
6 0
Many people would disagree with what Stalin did if it were done today. The world has changed. Most of these things would be seen as war crimes or just wrong.
You might be interested in
What do you think the plebian strategy of refusing to work was a good one? Why or why not?
trapecia [35]

Answer:

The Plebeians Revolt

They protested by going on strike. They would leave the city for a while, refuse to work, or even refuse to fight in the army. Eventually, the plebeians gained a number of rights including the right to run for office and marry patricians.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were rights of citizens limited in WWI? Was this constitutional? Explain
lilavasa [31]

Answer:

The law prohibited: Uttering, printing, writing, or publishing any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language intended to cause contempt,

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following areas is the fourth-largest island in the world and is considered part of the continent of Africa?
Nikitich [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

madagascar

6 0
2 years ago
Who were the colonial allies in the revolutionary war?
Alika [10]

Answer:

France and Spain

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Do the actions taken against the armenians seem like acceptable wartime actions?
Rashid [163]

Many countries around the world took different decisions during wartime. Some have been more brutal and difficult than we could have imagined. But in this situation that the Armenians faced, political events also had an effect. If you really want to get the right answer, you have to turn your perspective to both sides. Because both sides see themselves as justified in this event in history. And indeed, both sides have their faults and their justifications. In 1919, two American diplomats who wanted to investigate the event impartially visited the region. Their names were Emory Niles and Arthur Sutherland, and their view of the region was that both sides were right. Among the statements they wrote, it was written that the Armenians formed gangs against the Turks and plundered the Turkish villages in the region. But they also wrote that "Turkish soldiers were displaying a bad attitude towards Armenian civilians. According to the Turks, the reason for this was that the Armenians caused unrest in the region and took part in gang actions against the Turks. So the soldiers had to take control of the area. But when we look further into the past, we see that Armenians and Turks lived in peace in the empire. Even Armenian representatives took part in the Ottoman parliament in the 19th century. The reason why 2 communities that lived in harmony are so angry with each other is that foreign countries provoke the region to annex the region. We know that in the first world war, Russia wanted to invade the region. We also know that the Russians want to include the Orthodox Armenians in the region among themselves. It would not be difficult to conclude that the Russians formed gangs from the Armenians in the region and provoked them against the Kurdish and Turkish villages in the region. If this is indeed true, we would conclude that both parties are right in their own way.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What 3 nations mentioned in the lecture used African slaves in the Americas?
    5·2 answers
  • According to the article, what did Plato and Aristotle have in common ?
    7·1 answer
  • Why were Europeans bringing manufactured goods to the New World
    8·2 answers
  • Mark the statement if it accurately describes Magellan’s expedition.
    8·1 answer
  • What was one important social change resulting from urbanization
    11·1 answer
  • Why do you think the values of the samurai code appealed to the Japanese for centuries
    12·1 answer
  • Hello i need help
    7·2 answers
  • How did the Enlightenment affect the role of women in European countries? It led to women having equal rights. It led to women p
    8·2 answers
  • Why did the Americans want to know about Santa Fe?
    5·2 answers
  • Pls help giving brainless. no link!!!!<br>and can you find all of the answer keys of this pdf plss.​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!