Answer: The type of organizational structure that this most closely resembles is the<em><u> Matrix</u></em> structure.
Explanation:
When a group of people in business are put into formal groups based on their diverse occupational specialties it is a <u><em>matrix structure</em></u>. The groups that are put together based on similar service, products, clients, customers, and the regions that they are from.
The relationships that each person has are usually set up on a reporting grid. They use the grid which is different than a traditional reporting hierarchy. Each manager has a dual reporting relationship with each other. They can work as a regular functional manager and also a product manager.
The answer is D
I am 90% sure
welcome
The price elasticity of the bond, based on the years to maturity and the required rate of return is -0.494
<h3>How to find the price elasticity of he bond?</h3><h3 />
First, find the new price of the bond:
= 1, 000 / ( 1 + 15%)⁵
= $497
The change in price:
= (497 - 567) / 567
= -12.3%
Then find the percentage change in the required rate of return:
= (15 - 12%) / 12
= 25%
The price elasticity of the bond is:
= -12.3% / 25%
= -0.494
Find out more on price elasticity at brainly.com/question/5078326
#SPJ1
Answer:
variable cost per unit 150 dollars
Explanation:
As we aren't provided with a volume. We calculate considering variable costying system which onyl count variable cost as cost of goods manufactured:
raw material $ 75 per unit
labor 5 hours x 14 per hour = $ 70 per unit
variable ovehread $ 5 per unit
Variable cost per unit $ 150 per unit
the fixed overhead cost
5,110 + 3,730 + 1,550 + 6,600 + 8,760 = 25,750
will be considered cost of the period under variable costing
Answer:
Exxon's response worsened its public standing.
Explanation:
Crisis management is the application of game plan to help an organization deal with a sudden and significant negative event.
The Exxon's response is a perfect example of how company should apply thoughtful response in crisis management because Exxon corporation failed to follow several well-established procedures thereby damaged its public standing, failed to seize control of developments after the spill and sending lower-ranking executive to address the situation instead of the chairman going there himself to take control of the situation in a possible way.
The action taken by Exxon led to the impression that the company disregard pollution problem by not involving top management.
