Answer: Comparative
Explanation:
The comparative message is one of the type of business marketing strategy that helps in promoting the various types of products and the services in the market.
It basically helps in encouraging the improvement and also innovation in the given products to meet the desirable properties in an organization based on the consumer requirement in the market.
The comparative message compare the products in the market with the other competitors in terms of characteristics and features. Therefore, comparative is the correct answer.
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
The answer is D because if u were in a flood it would mess up ur car
Answer:
The idea of the margin is related to making decisions while thinking about the benefits and costs of small changes in behavior.
Explanation:
Economic theory suggests that economic agents (firms, consumers and government) think on the sidelines. This means that decisions are made taking into consideration the benefits and costs of each choice. For example, for a firm to increase a unit of production (marginal unit) it will calculate the cost of production of that unit (marginal cost) and the profit that additional unit will generate (marginal benefit).
In an ethnographic study of black and white working-class men, Deirdre Royster (2003) found that the job market was Not fair and not meritocratic
Explanation:
Deirdre Royster has put this popular wisdom to a test – revealing the subtleties and inequalities of a place of work in the Race and the Invisible Hand which favour the white person looking for jobs above the black one.
Royster is finding a reference in the stories of 25 black and 25 white men from the same vocational school who were looking for work on the same blue collar job market in the beginning of the 1990's.
Having carefully studied the professional successes, work ethics and values of Black men in the sense of particular deprivations, her research shows that young black and white men are the main differences— access to connections that are very relevant in job searches and admission.
