<u>Describe, in your own words, Sartre’s idea of the importance of reality and how that concept informs his view of cowardice.</u>
In his 1946 work <em>"Existentialism is Humanism",</em> Sartre explores existentialism and its effect on humanity. He states that a <u>coward</u> is: <em>"defined by the deed that he has done. What people feel obscurely, and with horror, is that the coward as we present him is guilty of being a coward." </em>The action of the coward defines him, an aspect that can be changed only by him. If he is committed to change what defines him, he can erase the notion of being a coward.
Nevertheless, Sartre mentions that “<em>There is no reality except in action</em>”, and this reveals the <u>importance of reality</u>. Humans, regardless of the outcome of an unattainable future, are still in control of some aspects of their reality through their actions; thus, they can shape their individual futures in a way.
This is <u><em>"total freedom"</em></u> defined solely by the individual, as Sartre says: <em>"Those who hide from this total freedom, in a guise of solemnity or with deterministic excuses, I shall call cowards." </em>What matters in someone's existence is what is decided. A <u>decision </u>is going to shape someone's reality and will define whether the person is a <em>hero</em> or a <em>coward</em>.<em> </em>
Answer:
Truncated sentences
Truncated sentences are often referred to as short sentences, but there is a difference between short sentences and truncated sentences.
I personally agree with this. However, only in certain conditions. If the United States was put in another World War or something to where it was fought on the homefront of very close and the U.S. was losing, they would have to do it in order for our country to survive.
The United States should not pass this without a VERY good reason. Although people should volunteer to risk their lives for our freedom and safety, It should not be required. There are some people who just are not fit for combat and some who should not be put through it. It should be a choice.
This country is about freedom. Being forced to join the army or military would be the opposite of freedom. This is supposed to be a country where the people rule, not where they are forced into combat. However, as stated before if it was ABSOLUTELY needed for us to survive as a country then it would be acceptable.
