The performance management approach that uses job performance evaluations to identify a company's best, average, and worst performing employees, using person-to-person comparisons, is known as "forced ranking".
<h3>What is forced ranking?</h3>
The contentious practice of "forced ranking," which grades employees against one another rather than against performance standards, is very popular in corporate America.
The problem with forced ranking are-
- This can lead to a lack of motivation and disengagement among employees as well as unneeded internal competition that can harm collaboration, creativity, and innovation and divert attention from market competition.
- Although contentious, forced ranking systems are legal. Employers who choose to take action based on those rankings, however, run a number of legal dangers.
The forced rankings beneficial from an employee perspective, here are reasons-
- This system teaches a manager how to assess employees objectively with the right management training.
- When the management system needs to be improved or formalised, forced rankings are advantageous.
- An essential component of business is analysing trends and developments.
To know more about example of forced ranking, here
brainly.com/question/6626507
#SPJ4
After US companies objected that the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act would put them at a competitive disadvantage, the FCPA was eventually amended to allow for <u>grease payments.</u>
<h3><u>Grease payments are what?</u></h3>
While a grease payment is made to hasten a trade or transaction, the former. The purpose of a grease payment is to expedite the process rather than to actually complete a transaction. Grease payments are not allowed under the FCPA as a way to influence the decision-making process of foreign officials.
In the event that they did, the money would be seen as a bribe and would be prohibited. It all comes down to the purpose of the money, and there is a very thin line between a greasing payment and a foreign bribe.
Learn more about grease payments with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14529082
#SPJ4
<u>Correct question:</u>
After US companies objected that the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act would put them at a competitive disadvantage, the FCPA was eventually amended to allow for ______.
Multiple choice question.
a) grease payments
b) import tariffs
c) commission payments
d) export tariffs
Answer:
d.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the correct steps that are used by the FASB in developing GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) would be the following: issuing a discussion memorandum, issuing an exposure draft, and issuing a statement of principle. This collection of accounting rules was then adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
<span>The ending equity is $315,000
This is just a matter of adding income and subtracting withdraws. So let's do it.
"Cragmont has beginning equity of $277,000,"
x = $277000
"net income of $63,000"
x = $277000 + $63000 = $340000
"withdrawals of $25,000"
x = $340000 - $25000 = $315000</span>
Answer:
c. $1,800
Explanation:
Economic cost calculates what is gained or lost when a particular activity is chosen over another activity.
It incorporates the opportunity cost of taking a particular activity into its calculation of cost.
The economic cost of Debbie taking the picture of her niece is :
$4000 - $2200 = $1800
I hope my answer helps you
