Answer:
In every form of analysis, it is always safer to take a macro or holistic view of the situation. This is true for the investment performance of a manager. One investment decision that went right does not suffice to classify an investment portfolio manager as proficient, neither is one that went south enough to tag him deficient.
The forecasting ability of managers, on the balance of probability, will vary for different cases, with a helicopter view of providing a more accurate measure of their performance.
However, if it was possible to analyse the market for volatility and adjust our forecasts it becomes unnecessary to look at and analyse all the information from a 12-month cycle before coming to terms about the performance of the manager.
Cheers!
Answer: $252
Explanation:
GDP is calculated by summing up the value of final goods and services in a country within a period. This means that intermediate values are not included and this is done to avoid double counting.
The GDP contribution here therefore will be the value of the meals created;
= 50 * 5.04
= $252
Answer:
Accounting profit= $55,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Last year, he earned $70000 in revenue. He had explicit costs of $15000.
<u>The accounting profit doesn't take into account the opportunity cost of other income options.</u>
Accounting profit= 70,000 - 15,000= $55,000
Answer:
a. Staples used to bind magazines - <u><em>Direct Material</em></u>
The staples are integral to holding the magazines so is a direct material.
b. Wages of printing machine employees. - <em><u>Direct Labor</u></em>
The printing machine employees are directly related to the magazine's production as they print it.
c. Maintenance on printing machines. -<em><u> Factory Overhead</u></em>
This cost is not directly associated with the publishing of the magazine so is an overhead.
d. Paper used in the magazine. -<em><u>Direct Material</u></em>
Without paper, the magazine can not be published which makes it a direct material.
Answer:
Deceptive pricing
Explanation:
By telling customers that the original price is $40 when it is really $25, High Tea is making their $20 price seem like a much better deal when it really has less value than they are advertising.