1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marrrta [24]
3 years ago
9

One of the basic belief of nonviolent direct action is to make the oppressor face the difference between the oppressors ideas an

d the oppressors actions. How did Selma march use this principle
History
1 answer:
Nikitich [7]3 years ago
7 0
<span>The march on Selma used this principle by using nonviolent means to get an idea across to the people and to the authorities. The protesters merely marched, and when they were met with violence in the form of beatings, the public saw this and was awakened as to the ideas of the march and the people marching. This was seen in contrast to the oppressor's (authorities) actions.</span>
You might be interested in
Salitang maylapi na nangagahulugang malago​
natita [175]

Answer:

What

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP!!!
Airida [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is c. Both groups had a lot of money and power, and also great political influence.

Explanation:

Hopefully this helped, if not HMU and I will try my best to get you a better answer!

Good luck! <3

4 0
3 years ago
What was the effect of the destruction of buffalo on native Americans?
pashok25 [27]
   Years ago Native Americans discovered what they believed was a gold mine. They noticed a herd of 30 to 60 million Buffalo's roaming the plains. The Native Americans hunted the buffalo so they can maintain an accurate amount of food. By the 1700's the Native Americans tamed some of the buffalo, which made hunting easier. The Native Americans moved with the herds so they can have a good supply of food. The Native people used different methods of hunting. One method use is called the Dog Soldier. A group of Native people who are called this, push some of the herd over a cliff so some of the animals would die. During winter they would chance the larger animals onto frozen lakes and slaughter them. The ice made it difficult for the buffalo to run. Warriors did the killing. The woman were responsible for getting the meat. The rest of the buffalo was used for clothing, shelter and weapons. Native American knew that their survival depended on the buffalo. They never killed too many. They only killed wanted they needed and celebrated the life of the buffalo after.

 

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the attitudes of many Americans change after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001?
Furkat [3]

Answer:

They became more concerned with foreign policy.  

Explanation:

The tenth commemoration of the 9/11 assaults has turned into an event for reconsidering the fear mongering danger to the United States. Three key inquiries have been raised. What is the status and current quality of al-Qa'ida, the gathering that executed 9/11? Have measures taken since 9/11 made Americans any more secure today? Why has the United States not been assaulted once more—in any event in the feeling of being assaulted on a scale moving toward 9/11? These are beneficial inquiries, despite the fact that they each include a confined point of view toward psychological oppression and counterterrorism. The first is naturally constrained by being centered around just a solitary assortment of fear mongering or even only a solitary gathering. The second more often than not precludes reference to any standard of progress and disappointment in verifying Americans from psychological oppression or to the expenses and exchange offs involved in getting a given level of wellbeing. The third inquiry is normally longing for a clarification that would be too easy to even think about being a precise examination of what has decided the measure of psychological oppression coordinated against the United States during the previous decade.

7 0
3 years ago
PLZ HELP ME FOR HISTORY PLEASE will give u brainliest if u help.
Helen [10]

Answer:

I think it is the first. But I am going to give you my source and then you can decide too.

Explanation:

Both colonies were founded in the 1600s. They were both havens of religious freedom; Massachusetts primarily had the Puritans, and Pennsylvania primarily had the Quakers. Both areas were rich in natural resources, such as lumber.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following groups of Europeans settled South Africa in large numbers?        A. Dutch   B. French   C. Spanish   D.
    9·2 answers
  • BEST ANSWER GETS BRAINLEIST!!!!!!!!!!
    7·2 answers
  • Where was the first permanent U.S. settlement?
    13·1 answer
  • After the Battle of the Rice Boats, what did the patriots do to establish control over Georgia?
    15·2 answers
  • What was the impetus for borglum's trips to washington<br> d.c., in the 1930's?
    10·1 answer
  • The Constitution set up a set of checks and balances among the three branches of government. Explain at least one specific way t
    9·2 answers
  • During the Cold War, Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque was used to:
    14·1 answer
  • HELPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Two candidates are running for office in the state senate. During a debate, the candidates say the following: Candidate A: "Peop
    14·1 answer
  • O
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!