The correct answer is A. Article i section 32 of the texas constitution applies to residents of the state of texas while the windsor case applies only to gay and lesbian couples on the federal level.
Through the Windsor case, the United States Supreme Court established that restricting the U.S federal interpretation of "marriage" to apply only opposite-sex couples is unconstitutional. This ruling applies across the nation, while the article i section 32 of the Texas constitution, that limits the definition of marriage to only opposite-sex unions, applies only in Texas.
Answer:
it's a propaganda all of it
Answer:
1.Popular Sovereignty. The principle of popular sovereignty was the basis for every new State constitution.
2.The major features of the articles of confederation were the establishment of the confederation as 'The United States of America', and an explanation of the rights possessed by any state and the amount of power that the state were entitled to.
3.The Federalists wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation because they believed that the structure the Articles laid out did not provide enough power for the federal (or national) government to effectively solve problems.
4.Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments. Many felt that the federal government would be too far removed to represent the average citizen.
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
reduce the growth of government spending, reduce the federal income tax and capital gains tax, reduce government regulation, and tighten the money supply in order to reduce inflation.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5154#:~:text=In%20an%20atmosphere%20of%20World,and%20resident%20aliens%20from%20Japan. This is the Link to FDR Executive Order 9066