The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.
I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.
I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.
On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.
Explanation:
LATIN was the language that only a small number of educated people, typically priest and nobility, could read. Erasmus has criticised the church for many of the same problems that Martin Luther later attacked.
I don’t see anything to check but you get back to me with something and I will help
73 of the British were killed and 174 were wounded while 26 went missing.It was considered a huge military victory and showed King George III that his unjust behavior wouldn't be tolerated in America.
D he did indeed preform poorly
