Answer:
The answer is: C) There is a valid contract
Explanation:
According to Appellate Court ruling in Steinberg v. Chicago Medical School;
The two parties (Joe and Sate University) entered a valid contract agreement upon receiving the $100 dollar application fee from Joe. State University´s catalog is considered to be the Offer part of this contract and the $100 application fee is considered the Consideration part of the contract.
I would say the shareholders could disapprove of the performance of their company if it was to consistently to lose money over say several quarters with no signs of improvement or no encouragement by management that this was a temporary situation,
Answer: a. Railroad loading
Explanation:
This question relates to the BCG matrix which allows a company with multiple divisions to know how to deal with its various divisions based on their growth rate and market share.
The question specifically relates to a matrix called "Cash cows". Cash cows are divisions that have a significant market share but a low growth rate. These divisions are stable and bring more money into the company than they cost to run.
This allows us to take profits from them and invest in other. The Railroad loading controls a significant market share of 75% but has a low growth rate so is a Cash cow.
Answer:
Minimum Transfer Price is $3.50
Explanation:
The Minimum transfer price is calculated by adding the variable cost per unit with the opportunity cost. In this case where the clock division is not operating at full capacity then the opportunity cost would be considered as $0.
Moreover, the division would be able to avoid a $0.5 cost per clock. Therefore, the variable cost will be $3.50 ($4 - $0.5) after eliminating the $0.5.
Finally, the minimum transfer would as follows:
Minimum Transfer Price = Variable cost + Opportunity Cost
Minimum Transfer Price = $3.50 + $0
Minimum Transfer Price = $3.50
Answer:
C. Both (i) and (ii) are true
Explanation:
Under perfect price discrimination, consumer surplus doesn't exist since the supplier is selling the good or service at the maximum price that each consumer is willing to pay. This situation maximizes supplier surplus.
Under perfect competition, both supplier and consumer surplus exist.
Since total social surplus = supplier surplus + consumer surplus, total surplus should be the same in both situations.
