One action that they could do is to change the constitution: pass an amendment! A disadvantage of this approach is that it will have to be ratified by the states, but the advantage is that they will never face this speficic it's an problem again.
Another action is changing the bill, taking out the problematic part. The advantage is that it's quicker than the first option, but the disadvantage is that they will have to give up on parts of the bill, which might have been very important.
Answer:
there are several consequences of inequity and most times, the likelihood of occurence differs. a repercaution or consequence is that Jack will try to increase his outcomes by meeting his senior heads or increase in his pay and an option also of maximum use of company facilities and resources.
and also, he can also limit/reduce his inputs by working fewer hours and with low impact in giving his high performance. peradventure if these actions does not reduce his feelings of inequity drastically, it will be advisable for Jack to seach/look for a purchasing management job in another firm orhave a second though about going into a better and higher-paying jobs still within his current organization. Jack's feelings of inequity can be limited/reduce if he can change his perceptions, but this is more difficult given the clarity of salary information. It is also unlikely that Jack would push Sam to work harder or try to reduce his salary and also for Jack to change his comparison other can be difficult.
Explanation:
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Respiration occurs in the mitochondria.
Photosynthesis occurs in photosynthetic cells.
Hope I helped !
Answer:
A nation decides to produce fewer fighter jets and more bridges
Explanation:
The issue of government choice between "weapons or butter" is a metaphor for governments' decisions about what to do with scarce public resources in times of war. Should governments invest in armaments or invest in internal needs, such as in infrastructure works? This is a trade-off, which consists of making a choice that excludes the other, even if it is possible to counterbalance the investments. In the case of the question, the trade of is between war fighters or between bridges - infrastructure for the country.
