Answer and Explanation:
NOTE: since this is supposed to be a personal answer, feel free to edit and adapt the information to suit yourself.
Have you ever wanted to say something clever (to impress someone), and you couldn't think of anything to say? What kind of emotions did this bring up for you?
Yes, I have. It has happened several times. When I realized I would not be able to come up with anything clever to say, I ended up frustrated and annoyed at myself. However, those feelings did not tend to last long. After some time has passed, I usually realize that my motivation as well as the context would never allow me to say something impressive. Impressive statements normally come naturally, when we feel comfortable with the situation and the topic. If we feel the need to impress, that already makes the context more difficult and uncomfortable, reducing our chances to come up with something good.
Answer:
The passage begins with the main character, Lymie, sitting in a restaurant ... The first paragraph describes the book in front of him (“Blank pages front ... passage. QUESTION 2. Choice C is the best answer. The main purpose of the first ..... This is supported in lines 61-65: “Conventional agriculture makes use of 171.
Homework Help Questions & Answers: Math, Science ...
https://www.enotes.com › homework-help
Explanation:
The prepositional phrase is “with the play”.
This is because a prepositional phrase begins with a preposition and is not essential in creating a complete sentence; instead it adds details.
With is a preposition, so with the play is a prepositional phrase. “She was bored” is still a meaningful sentence without the prepositional phrase, so we know that our answer is correct.
Hope this helps!
The main reason why Franz Kafka, before his death, instructed his friend Max Brod to destroy all his unpublished manuscripts was because he didn't want his unfinished work to be read.
Answer:
The case the United States v. Susan B. Anthony was a criminal case taken up against Susan B. Anthony after she attempted to vote. She was found guilty and told to pay a $100 fine, which she adamantly refused. One argument that the defendant, Susan B. Anthony, had was that the fourteenth amendment said that all people born in the united states were citizens and that states could not infringe on their "privileges and immunities of citizens" which includes voting (as seen in the fifteenth amendment). However, the court argued that those only pertained to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as children were citizens but could not vote. Then, when faced with the fifteenth amendment the court said that since nowhere in the amendment is sex listed, women's right to vote was not protected.
