Answer:
EXPLAINING STRESSFUL EVENTS BY ATTRIBUTING THEM TO A TEMPORARY SITUATION.
Explanation:
Attribution theory deals with how the social perceiver uses information to arrive at causal explanations for events. It examines what information is gathered and how it is combined to form a causal judgment.
Explanatory style is the characteristic, habitual way individuals explain the causes of good and bad events they experience.
Stressful events can either be good or bad. People may attribute stressful events to factors that are either temporary or permanent and specific or universal.
Carmela's thought means she is explaining her stressful work (event) by attributing it to a temporary situation since she thinks she will get the hang of it in a few months.
Therefore, an example of the explanatory style is EXPLAINING STRESSFUL EVENTS BY ATTRIBUTING THEM TO TEMPORARY EVENTS.
If a small country wants to buy aircraft from the United States and the United States wants to export its aircraft, the United States may work through WTO in removing preset trade barriers so that the small country can more easily purchase the aircraft.
Explanation:
The World Trade Organisation (WTO) is the only international organisation that follows global trade law. It primarily ensures trading is as easy, consistent and free as possible.
World countries meet in the WTO to discuss whether trade restrictions, such as tariffs, should be reduced. WTO talks are conducted in "rounds" where every nation negotiates a trade development agreement, takes a year or two off again and starts negotiations for a new deal.
Answer:
the present value is $467,335.2613
Explanation:
The computation of the value worth today is shown below:
= Amount in two years ÷ (1 + rate of interest)^number of years
= $590,000 ÷ (1 + 12% ÷ 2)^2×2
= $590,000 ÷ 1.06^4
= $590,000 ÷ 1.26247696
= $467,335.2613
Hence, the present value is $467,335.2613
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
no
Explanation:
In order to achieve optimal employment level, the ratio of productivity between employees must be equal to the ratio between their wages, e.g. an employee who is 25% more productive, should earn 25% more.
In this case, the productive ratio is 15:20 or 3:4, while the wage ratio is 8:12 or 2:3. Since the wage ratio is lower than the productivity ratio (2:3 < 3:4), the two employees are not optimally employed.
Answer:
The answer is: C) $62,000
Explanation:
The partnership had a total ordinary income of $200,000. It made guaranteed payments to its three partners (Molly, Amber and Pat) of $20,000 each ($60,000 in total).
So the partnership adjusted income is reduced to $140,000, out of that amount, 30% belongs to Molly. Molly's share of the partnership adjusted income is $42,000.
Molly's total earnings from the partnership are $62,000 ($20,000 + $42,000)
