It is the amount you pay each month times 12
15x12=£180
Answer:
Just to be on the safe side the first #1 is 31.5 and the second #1 is 57.82
Answer:
Since the calculated value of z= -1.496 does not fall in the critical region z < -1.645 we conclude that the new program is effective. We fail to reject the null hypothesis .
Step-by-step explanation:
The sample proportion is p2= 7/27= 0.259
and q2= 0.74
The sample size = n= 27
The population proportion = p1= 0.4
q1= 0.6
We formulate the null and alternate hypotheses that the new program is effective
H0: p2> p1 vs Ha: p2 ≤ p1
The test statistic is
z= p2- p1/√ p1q1/n
z= 0.259-0.4/ √0.4*0.6/27
z= -0.141/0.09428
z= -1.496
The significance level ∝ is 0.05
The critical region for one tailed test is z ≤ ± 1.645
Since the calculated value of z= -1.496 does not fall in the critical region z < -1.645 we conclude that the new program is effective. We fail to reject the null hypothesis .
We can represent this situation by the equation 2x+4x+5x=33.
Then 11x=33, and x = 3.
Then the children's ages are in the ratio 2x:4x:5x, or 2(3):4(3):5(3), or
6:12:15.
Do these 3 ages add up to 33? 6 + 12 + 15 = 33? YES!
The children's ages are 6, 12 and 15 years respectively.
