Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.
They were known as the federalist
<span>The four river valley civilizations were the Tigris & Euphrates Valleys, the Nile River Valley, the Indus River Valley, and the Yellow River Valley. Civilizations developedaround rivers because their waters provided places to hunt and fish. Also, as the rivers flooded, the lands around them became fertile.</span>Mar 2, 2015
Answer is D
extra characters and stuff
Answer -
<em>Question 1) B. Stay out of the economy</em>
<em>Question 2) D. buying on the margin</em>
<em>Question 3) C. farmers</em>
<em><u>Hope this helps! Please mark brainliest! </u></em>
<em><u /></em>
