Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
Answer:
the emperor had more control over goods & the citizens. when the trading had ended, the foreigners were told to sail away.
out of the 3 branches of government I would say the executive branch.......if not then ima say President
So the German High Seas Fleet put to sea under the command of the combative Admiral Reinhard Scheer. The British fleet sailed to intercept them, led by the much more conservative Admiral Sir John Jellicoe. Although Britain lost the most ships, the outcome of the battle was not that clear cut.
Answer:
Growing a surplus of food
using irrigation in farming
trading between city-States
being located near rivers
Explanation:
Just answered the question on Clever
