Answer:
Speech Segmentation.
Explanation:
'Speech segmentation' is demonstrated as the process of identifying and recognizing the affiliation between the words, phonemes, as well as syllables employed in specific spoken language. It focuses on the context and emphasizes their study as a whole in order to promote a lexical meaning.
In the given situation, Carlos was incapable of '<u>speech segmentation</u>' as he could not understand the lexical and contextual meaning of the phrase and failed to understand its meaning as a whole. Therefore, <u>since he read the words in isolation and not as a whole, he was inefficient in 'speech-segmentation'. </u>
Here, most appropriate answer would be: "<span>the title of the work, then the author's last name, and then the page number
In short, Your Answer would be Option C
Hope this helps!</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
"Wait for me!" Emma called.
The best rebuttal to address the counterclaim is: With modern technology, scientists can make advances without involving the one hundred million animals now used each year for animal testing.
A claim is an opinion that a person holds about something. A counterclaim is a statement that opposes a claim.
A rebuttal that addresses a counterclaim is also a statement that opposes the counterclaim. The claim that animal testing should be banned was put forward.
A counterclaim that shows that animal testing has led to breakthroughs in medicine was made.
A rebuttal of the counterclaim will be that modern technology can help scientists to make advances in medicine without using millions of animals.
(Claim: Animal testing is unnecessary in this century and should be banned.
Read the counterclaim.
Animal testing has led to important medical breakthroughs.)
Learn more about claims here:
brainly.com/question/2748145
The theme explored mostly is that <span>there is no escape from our destinies and that we should embrace them without fear.
Brainliest?</span>
